Electric potential, spherical conductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric potential of a spherical conductor system, specifically addressing the potential at points A and B in relation to the presence of an outer sphere. Participants explore the implications of integrating the electric field and the effects of the outer sphere on potential values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of electric potential using integration of the electric field, questioning the correctness of their results. There are considerations of the effects of the outer sphere and the application of Gauss's law. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between points A, B, C, and D.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants sharing their reasoning and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the nature of electric fields, but there is no explicit consensus on the final potential values at A and B.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential confusion due to mixing up concepts with non-conducting spheres. Participants also note the importance of additive constants in potential calculations, particularly in relation to boundary conditions.

sparkle123
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hello,
in this diagram, the shaded regions are spherical conductors.
a1a6777d.png

What's the potential at A=B?
Ignoring the outer sphere, it should be kQ/R.
When you add the outer sphere, potential at C=D=0 and electric field between B and C is kQ/x^2
so i integrated (kQ/x^2) dx with interval [2R, R] and got -kQ/2r
Is that right? I think the potential at A=B should be positive though, and the answer says so too :(
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sparkle123 said:
When you add the outer sphere, potential at C=D=0 and electric field between B and C is kQ/x^2
so i integrated (kQ/x^2) dx with interval [2R, R] and got -kQ/2r
Is that right? I think the potential at A=B should be positive though, and the answer says so too :(
Thanks!

Do not forget that the electric field is a vector, and it points outward in this case. When you calculate the potential, you determine ΔU with the line integral -∫Edr. If you go inward E and dr point to opposite directions, the integrand is negative. You do not get confused when integrating from B to C and get U(B) knowing that U(C)=0.

ehild
 
I like Serena said:
Hi sparkle123! :smile:

I'm afraid he potential at A is not equal to B, nor is C=D.

Ignoring the outer sphere, the potential between R and 2R is kQ/r.
Furthermore, even with the outer sphere, this is still true.
As for the reason, we would have to apply Gauss's law (the first of Maxwell's equations).
Are you familiar with that one?

Outside the outer sphere the electric field of the inner sphere cancels the electric field of the outer sphere...

The potential is the same at every point of a metal. So U(A)=U(B) and U(C) = U(D). I think you meant the electric field, kQ/r2.
The potential is not kQ/r when the outer sphere is present, as this would give non-zero potential outside. You need an additive constant: U=kQ/r + C so as it give zero at r=2R.

ehild
 
Sorry, I've deleted my post to avoid confusion.
I was mixing it up with another problem where the spheres were non-conducting.
 
Thanks to all of you! :D
just to be sure, so the potential at B is kQ/R without the outer sphere, and with the outer sphere its kQ/2R, and ehild's additive constant C is -kQ/2R to give U(B) = kQ/R - kQ/2R = kQ/2R?
Thanks again!
 
Yep! :smile:
 
Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K