Electrical Potential of Semicircle Insulating Wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a semicircular insulating wire with a uniform charge distribution. The user successfully derived the potential as kQ/a, aligning with the solution manual's answer. However, they expressed confusion regarding the integration method used for dq, questioning the validity of their approach compared to the book's method involving dq=(lambda)dl. It was clarified that while both methods yield the correct potential, the integration technique differs based on the context of the problem, particularly when calculating electric fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of charge distribution concepts, particularly uniform charge distribution
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including Coulomb's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from charge distributions using integration
  • Learn about the differences between calculating electric potential and electric fields
  • Explore the concept of linear charge density and its applications in electrostatics
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques for varying charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric potential calculations in electrostatics.

stod
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin insulating rod is bent into a semicircular wire of radius a, with a total charge of Q distributed uniformly along the rod. Calculate the potential at the center of the curvature if the potential is assumed to be zero at infinity.


Homework Equations



V=ʃ (kdq/r)



The Attempt at a Solution



I integrated the equation from zero to Q, and my final answer was kQ/a, which was the same as the book's solution manual. My problem is, the solution manual did it a completely different and longer way, and I'm just wondering if my method is not valid (because the book does it the same way as me on some similar examples).

the book made dq=(lambda)dl, where lambda=Q/pi*a, and dl=a*dθ.
Then, after moving stuff around, the final integral looked like this:

integral(k*Q/pi*a)dθ, and they integrated from zero to pi.


I've spent a few hours trying to figure out why you can just integrate dq from zero to Q in some instances, while in other instances that seem very similar (like this) you have to make dq equal something. Or, did the book do this as a matter of preference, and it is okay to integrate dq from zero to Q in this instance? Please help clear up this extreme fogginess for me. Thank you in advance to anyone who can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the case of potential you can use your method. Because the net potential is the scalar addition of potential due to dq. But if you want to find the electric field at the center, you cannot use this method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K