Electricity and Magnetism: Verifying the Inverse Square Law

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter giodude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse square law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around verifying the inverse square law using concepts from the Electricity and Magnetism textbook by Purcell and Morin, specifically the 3rd edition. The problem involves calculating the electric field, ##\vec{E}(\vec{r})##, of a static point charge, ##Q##, using Gauss's Law and the spherical symmetry of the system. The derived formula for the electric field is ##E_r(r) = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}##, confirming the inverse square relationship. The discussion emphasizes the simplicity of the mathematical approach due to the spherical symmetry inherent in the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in integral form
  • Familiarity with spherical symmetry in electric fields
  • Basic knowledge of vector calculus
  • Concept of electric fields from point charges
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss's Law in various coordinate systems
  • Explore applications of spherical symmetry in electrostatics
  • Learn about the implications of the inverse square law in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the relationship between electric fields and potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electric field concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of classical field theory.

giodude
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm currently working through Purcell and Morin, Electricity and Magnetism textbook and came across a problem in which the goal is to verify the inverse square law. I'm worked through and completed the problem. However, I'm confused how this verifies the inverse square law, I'm posting the images of the solution below.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The attached files are not in .pdf format.
How were they produced ?
 
I took images of them on my phone and then airdropped them to my laptop, I'll fix them up when I get back to my laptop and edit the post. Thank you.
 
I've here the 3rd edition, where it seems that the authors try to derive the Coulomb field of a static point charge. As to be expected from this book, it's all buried in some strange pedagogics, making the problem more complicated than it is.

The idea is simply to use the spherical symmetry of the problem. So let the point charge, ##Q##, sit at rest in the origin of a Cartesian coordinate system. We want to calculate ##\vec{E}(\vec{r})## at any position ##\vec{r} \neq \vec{0}##, because at the origin we have obviously a singularity, which is characteristic for the assumption of a "point charge" in classical field theory.

Mathematically the problem is simple because of spherical symmetry. There's no other vector in the problem than ##\vec{r}##, because no direction is in any way special except the direction of the position vector itself. Thus you can make the Ansatz
$$\vec{E} = E_r \vec{e}_r,$$
where ##\vec{e}_r=\vec{r}/r##. The "radial component" ##E_r## can only depend on ##r=|\vec{r}|##, again due to the spherical symmetry.

Now you simply use Gauss's Law in integral form
$$\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{E}=Q_V/\epsilon_0.$$
It's obvious, again because of the spherical symmetry, to choose a spherical shell of radius ##r## around the origin for ##\partial V##. The surface-normal vectors are ##\vec{e}_r## and thus with our ansatz for ##\vec{E}##
$$E_r (r) 4 \ pi r^2=Q/\epsilon_0 \; \Rightarrow \; E_r(r)=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}.$$
That's it! It's simply spherical symmetry and Gauss's Law!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K