Electricity Without the analogies (need expert varification)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tim9000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of how electricity flows, particularly in conductors, and critiques common analogies like the "shock-wave" analogy. The original poster expresses confusion about the behavior of electric fields in conductors, noting that while a conductor seems to have infinite permittivity, it also prevents electric fields from propagating inside. They explore the idea that electric flux may flow through the skin depth of a conductor at near the speed of light due to circulating charges. The conversation highlights the distinction between electrostatic conditions and current-carrying scenarios, questioning whether a current-carrying wire can be classified as a type of transmission line mode. The thread seeks expert verification on these concepts to clarify the underlying physics.
tim9000
Messages
866
Reaction score
17
The topic of how electricity actually flows is one of the worst answered most common questions I've seen. Best answer I've seen was here by Gokul43201:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=377359&page=3

I also HATE the "shock-wave" analogy


YET I'm still confused, as I know an electric field cannot propagate inside a conductor, I have read that a conductor is like a medium with infinite permittivity. -> I've seen pictures where the conductor's free charges move to set up an apposing electric field (I think) on the surface.

Crux:
So I always thought that a conducting wire was a TM mode TL, but I haven't seen any literature supporting my assumption (from Right hand screw rule), hence I believe it to be wrong.
Am I to conclude that infact the Electric Flux does indeed flow through at least the skin-depth (if AC) of a conductor at near the speed of 'c', because the charges are able to circulate in a loop? (and thus not oppose the E-field)

It seems weird to me that the conductor would go from having what seemed to be infinite permittivity (like an isolated sphere in an E-field), to almost no permittivity, so the E-field sticks inside the conductor and don't leak out, as it often is not a straight line (wires etc).

(or an adoquate distance for high frequencies, in an antenna)


THANKS
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For anyone curious, I think I may have found half the answer to my question here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=154617&page=2
In that-
"Now, what is an EXTREME change in charge flux, is when it tries to cross the surface of the conductor: it simply can't. So all charge that wants to flow "outside" of the conductor is accumulated on its surface! And this in such a way, that the E-field is modified UNTIL it is entirely parallel to the conductor surface (because only then, no charge wants to "flow outside" and hence gets accumulated more at the surface)."Although I still wouldn't mind hearing a "no" about the wire not being a TM mode TL, from someone who knew.
 
tim9000 said:
I know an electric field cannot propagate inside a conductor,

This is true in electrostatics, but a current-carrying wire is not an electrostatic situation.
 
jtbell said:
This is true in electrostatics, but a current-carrying wire is not an electrostatic situation.

Thanks for clearing that up. Is a current carrying wire of a type of mode TL?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top