How Does Lightning Affect Lattice Behavior in Macroscopic Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter armandowww
  • Start date Start date
armandowww
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I was searching for some proof on macroscopical theory about lattice behaviour under lightning. I found a passage in which the average in time of optical power is given by average of electrical field square times constant dielectric ratio four pi! How could I explain this concept?
Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about - it would help if you provided a reference or link to the passage.

In general, the energy density of an electric field is half the number you stated.

\frac{d{\cal E}}{dV} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon E^2~~(SI~Units)

\frac{d{\cal E}}{dV} = \frac{1}{8\pi} \epsilon_r E^2~~(Gaussian~Units)
 
I've just forgot to say you I'm in gaussian units... but your 8 is my 4
 
Mayhap... the reason is this: you told about an energy density at a given instant, while the time average of my waves (PLANE waves) has brought new root-square-two terms (2 terms because E is the base of a power 2) forward in my formula...
Is the Poynting vector involved in anyway?
Thank you
 
E_{RMS} = \frac{E_0}{\sqrt{2}}

That would only make things worse.

\frac{d{\cal E}}{dV} = \frac{1}{8\pi} \epsilon_r E_{RMS}^2 = \frac{1}{16\pi} \epsilon_r E_0^2
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top