Electromagnetic force of Electrons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of commanding all electrons in a human body to spin in synchronicity, questioning the resulting magnetic force and its effects on gravity. Participants clarify that electrons are bound within atoms and cannot be manipulated in such a manner. They explore the implications of a steady current produced by moving charges and the challenges of calculating magnetic fields in this context. The conversation ultimately highlights the complexities of atomic structure and the limitations of manipulating electron behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and electron behavior
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory and magnetic fields
  • Knowledge of the principles of electric current and charge
  • Basic grasp of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electromagnetism and magnetic fields in circuits
  • Explore the concept of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the behavior of electrons in atomic orbitals
  • Investigate the effects of electric current on magnetic fields and forces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, students of electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the theoretical implications of electron behavior and magnetic forces.

Next223
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
If you could command all the electrons in an average human body and get them to spin in synchronicity (a clockwise circle in the horizontal plane) how much magnetic force does that produce? Would it create a force against gravity and make you feel lighter? How much lighter?
If you could command all the electrons in an average human body and get them to spin in synchronicity (a clockwise circle in the horizontal plane) how much magnetic force does that produce? Would it create a force against gravity and make you feel lighter? How much lighter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Is there a pupose to this question? A ring of moving charges constitutes a steady current, which will produce a magnetic field. Most of the electrons is the human body are bound within neutral atoms and molecules. They are not free electrons.
 
I just want to know the answer its not homework or anything.
 
Next223 said:
I just want to know the answer its not homework or anything.
The question as it stands can't be answered because doesn’t make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
What more do you need to answer the question? Does it depend on the diameter of the circle they are spinning around and how fast they are going? What kind of formula should I look for to calculate it?
 
Next223 said:
What more do you need to answer the question? Does it depend on the diameter of the circle they are spinning around and how fast they are going? What kind of formula should I look for to calculate it?
It's the bit about commanding the electrons in the human body that doesn't make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
It's just a hypothetical. Are you wondering if I'm a mutant?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Next223 said:
It's just a hypothetical.

Hypothetical questions also have to make sense. You can't make all electrons in human body to "spin in synchronicity", whatever that means.
 
Next223 said:
Summary:: If you could command all the electrons in an average human body and get them to spin in synchronicity (a clockwise circle in the horizontal plane) how much magnetic force does that produce? Would it create a force against gravity and make you feel lighter? How much lighter?

If you could command all the electrons in an average human body and get them to spin in synchronicity (a clockwise circle in the horizontal plane) how much magnetic force does that produce? Would it create a force against gravity and make you feel lighter? How much lighter?
I think what my colleagues here are trying to tell you is that electrons don't work that way. They do have angular momentum, but they are not little points orbiting a nucleus with a definite location and velocity at each point in time.

You could, in principle, ask what would happen if all of the electrons had the same angular momentum. But even that is problematic since the angular momentum is one of the things that characterizes atomic orbitals. So due to the exclusion principle you could only have one electron around each nucleus. This would obviously make matter very unstable.

So, what you might ask is something like this: suppose that you had a human-sized mass of monoatomic hydrogen gas in a human-sized container and they were all in a +z angular momentum eigenstate, what would the magnetic field be?

@weirdoguy @PeroK am I missing anything with this formulation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and pinball1970
  • #10
But knowing the mass of a human body, you could work out the number of nucleons = neutrons + protons, then halve that to get the approximate number of electrons. From there, compute the total electric charge of the body in coulombs. The number will not be useful, but it would be interesting, and educational.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #11
Dale said:
So, what you might ask is something like this: suppose that you had a human-sized mass of monoatomic hydrogen gas in a human-sized container and they were all in a +z angular momentum eigenstate, what would the magnetic field be?
Even that is problematic. Magnetic field where exactly?

The original question asks about force. The only possible question is what field provides the force. If it's the Earth's magnetic field, it will be tiny. And in the wrong direction (predominantly down).
 
  • #12
If your body was ionised completely, and the electrons were collected, then they flowed as a one amp current along a conductor, how long would it take the total charge to pass ?
Mass of body = 100 kg
Mass of one nucleon = 1.675e-27 kg
Number of nucleons = 100 / 1.675e-27 = 5.97e28
Half nucleons are protons = 5.97e28 / 2 = 2.985e28
Each balanced by one electron = 2.985e28 electrons.
Elementary charge on electron 1.602e-19 coulomb.
1.602e-19 * 2.985e28 = 4.782e9 coulomb = 4.782 GC.
A 1 amp current is a charge flow of 1 coulomb per second.
It would therefore take 4.782e9 seconds to flow along a wire.
There are 365.25*24*60*60 = 31.5576 million seconds in a year.
The 1 amp current would need to flow for 4.782e9 / 31557600. = 151.53 years.
You can do nothing with that current because you were ionised in the first line.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #13
Thank you everyone for your replies. I'm more into biology than this field so forgive me for asking questions that require further input to answer.

"You can do nothing with that current because you were ionised in the first line."
Do you mean that because there are a bunch of positive charges everywhere that it doesn't amount to much?

What if the question changes to this: We have a 1 foot diameter loop in the horizontal plane with all of the electrons in a human traveling on that loop. No other charges are present. You can choose their speed.
 
  • #14
Next223 said:
What if the question changes to this: We have a 1 foot diameter loop in the horizontal plane with all of the electrons in a human traveling on that loop. No other charges are present. You can choose their speed.
That's a standard problem of electromagnetism. It's covered here, for example:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html
 
  • #15
Baluncore said:
602e-19 * 2.985e28 = 4.782e9 coulomb = 4.782 GC.
Geez.
In layman terms, that's the charge in a million AA cells, 10, 000 car batteries, or a hundred electric forklift batteries, give or take.
 
  • #16
Yes. It is a significant charge.

It gets more difficult if you only allow one electron per atom as you must then estimate the water content and chemistry of a body.
It takes a mother 9 months to produce a 3 kg baby. If the assembly of each atom of the child required one electron to flow, then what is the average current needed over the 9 months to make a baby.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K