Electromagnetic induction in current loops

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around electromagnetic induction in a wire configured as two loops within an alternating magnetic field. Participants explore the relationship between induced electromotive forces (emfs) in the loops and the potential difference at their crossing point, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving a wire folded into two loops with different radii and resistances, seeking to determine the potential difference between the loops at their crossing point.
  • Another participant questions the specific points between which the potential difference is being calculated.
  • A participant suggests using Faraday's Law to calculate the induced emf, emphasizing the distinction between emf and voltage.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of potential in the context of the electric field and the closed loop integral, noting that the potential gained depends on the path taken around the loops.
  • One participant clarifies that the two loops are part of a single piece of wire and seeks to understand how the potential difference relates to the direction of current flow.
  • There is a suggestion that the potential difference could be equal to E1 or E2 depending on the direction of current flow through the loops.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of Faraday's Law and the nature of emf, but there is no consensus on the calculation of potential difference at the crossing point, with differing interpretations of how to approach the problem based on current direction and path taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions of potential and emf, and the implications of resistance on the potential difference. The discussion includes various assumptions about the configuration of the loops and the nature of the magnetic field.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in electromagnetic theory, particularly in understanding the nuances of induced emf in complex loop configurations and the implications of alternating magnetic fields.

phys
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

would be really grateful if someone could help throw some light on this - its probably really simple but I am typing myself up in loops!

I have a piece of wire which is placed in an external AC magnetic field which is varying sinusoidally. The wire is folded to make two rings of radii r1 and r2 with resistances R1 and R2. (see picture below) I have derived an equation for the current in the loop in terms of the emfs E1 and E2 induced in the 2 parts of the loops. I think that this is I = (E1+E2)/(R1+R2)

I want to work out potential difference between the two parts of the loop at their crossing point in terms of the same variables - any ideas on how I would approach this? Thank you very much

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-04-03 at 18.55.43.png
    Screen Shot 2017-04-03 at 18.55.43.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
phys said:
I want to work out potential difference between the two parts of the loop at their crossing point
Between which two points?
 
The bottom point of each loop
 
I don't understand the question. You can calculate the EMF, i.e., the vorticity of the em. field (it's not a voltage!) according to Faraday's Law
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}.$$
In integrated form it's
$$\int_{\partial A} \mathrm{d} \vec{x} \cdot \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_A \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{f} \cdot \vec{B}=-\frac{1}{c} \dot{\Phi}.$$
Here you run around two loops, i.e., the total flux is the sum of the fluxes through the small and the large loop.
 
@vanhees71 is correct. Imagine you are sitting at the bottom point of the two loops. Let's say your potential is zero. Now you go in the direction of the electric field in the loop, around the small loop then around the big loop and you return to the point you were at. Now what is the potential you have gained. It is the closed loop integral of E.dl which is simply the time derivative of the sum of the fluxes through both loops. So if you AC field is $$Bsin(\omega t)$$ then the sum of your fluxes is $$Bsin(\omega t)\pi r_{1}^{2}+Bsin(\omega t)\pi r_{2}^{2}$$

Then $$\oint{E}{dl}=Bcos(\omega t)\omega \pi(r_{1}^{2}+r_{2}^{2})=$$ difference in potential

Your formula for current is correct, by the way.
 
Perhaps I should have emphasized more that there is no potential here, because ##\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E} \neq 0##. It's an EMF, not a voltage!
 
Yes, you are right in that. There is no fixed potential assigned to every point in space as such. I meant the EMF "gained" on taking one turn around the length of the wire. Of course this is lost due the resistance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thanks everyone!
The two loops are actually one loop - in the sense that it is one piece of wire.
I want to work out the pd between the two points which are at the bottom - I think that an equivalent circuit is the diagram below.
I therefore want to work out the pd between the two points that I have crossed.
I'm probably wrong but would the pd just be E1 if the current was anticlockwise or E2 if the current was clockwise?
If the field is Bsinwt would this mean that the pd changes between E1 and E2?
 
and now with the image!
 

Attachments

  • 20170404_171028.jpg
    20170404_171028.jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 434
  • #10
Yes, if suppose the emf in the small loop is E1 and you go over the portion of the loop that is the small circle the pd will be E1. If you go over the portion that is the big circle the pd will be E2. It all depends on what your path is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K