Electromagnetic Potential Gauge Transformations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around electromagnetic potential gauge transformations, specifically focusing on the mathematical formulations and implications of these transformations within the context of gauge theory and Lorentz covariance. Participants explore the relationships between the four-potential and gauge transformations, as well as the implications of different gauge choices.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents equations related to electromagnetic potentials and queries about the implications of gauge transformations on these potentials.
  • Another participant states a general form of gauge transformation for \( A_\mu \) and notes that all other results can be derived from this basic formula.
  • A different participant questions whether the four-potential transforms like a tensor under different gauge conditions, expressing uncertainty about the Lorentz covariance of the four-potential in non-Lorentz gauges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gauge transformations and their implications for the four-potential, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the Lorentz covariance of the four-potential in various gauge conditions, and the discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gauge transformations that may not be universally accepted.

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
[tex]\Delta\vec{A}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \vec{A}}{\partial t^2}=-\mu_0\vec{j}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta\varphi-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \varphi}{\partial t^2}=-\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}\rho[/tex]

[tex]c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_{0}}}[/tex]

[tex]\epsilon_0=8,85\cdot 10^{-12}\frac{F}{m}[/tex]

[tex]\mu_0=4\pi 10^{-7}T[/tex]

[tex]div\vec{A}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial t}=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial _y}+\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial z}+\frac{\partial (\frac{1}{c}\varphi)}{\partial (ct)}=0[/tex]

[tex]A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

[tex]A_{\mu}=g_{\mu\nu}A^{\nu}[/tex]

[tex]A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

[tex]divA^{\mu}=0[/tex]

Can I say from

[tex]A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

and

[tex]A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

something more about gauge transformations of electromagnetic potentials

[tex]\varphi_0=\varphi-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}_0=\vec{A}+gradf[/tex]

I think about - sign in first term [tex]-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex] and + sign in second term [tex]+gradf[/tex]


Or

[tex]\varphi_0=\varphi+\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}_0=\vec{A}-gradf[/tex]

[tex]\Delta A^{\mu}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 A^{\mu}}{\partial t^2}=-\mu_0j^{\mu}[/tex]

[tex]j^{\mu}=(j_x,j_y,j_z,c\rho)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gauge transformation of [tex]A_\mu[/tex] is

[tex]A_\mu\mapsto A_\mu +\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^\mu}[/tex]

or, alternatively, which is the same replacing f by -f:

[tex]A_\mu\mapsto A_\mu -\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^\mu}[/tex]

All the rest you derive from this basic formula.
 
@ arkajad

Thanks!
 
Petar Mali said:
Can I say from

[tex]A^{\mu}=(\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

and

[tex]A_{\mu}=(-\vec{A},\frac{1}{c}\varphi)[/tex]

something more about gauge transformations of electromagnetic potentials
I thought that only the Lorentz gauge condition was Lorentz covariant. So does the four-potential in a different gauge even transform like a tensor? I would think not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
998
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K