Electromagnetism: Charge Density of a Shell

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Dirac Delta function in electromagnetism, specifically in representing charge densities for continuous distributions like a charged spherical shell. The original poster seeks clarification on how to express the charge density of such a shell using the Dirac Delta function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between point charges and continuous charge distributions, discussing how the Dirac Delta function can represent charge densities. There are attempts to derive expressions for the charge density of a spherical shell and questions about the dimensionality of the Dirac Delta function.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the mathematical representation of charge densities using the Dirac Delta function, while others confirm understanding of the concepts presented. There is an ongoing exploration of how to derive the charge density for a spherical shell and the implications of dimensional analysis related to the Dirac Delta function.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for integration to determine constants in the charge density expressions and discuss the implications of having a shell with zero thickness in the context of charge distribution.

fusionshrimp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We learned in E&M about the Dirac Delta function and its applications to representing the densities of point charges in space. For example, the charge density of space with a point charge q at the origin is given by q*delta(r). How does this density representation work with continuous distributions, such as a charged spherical shell?


Homework Equations


None really


The Attempt at a Solution


Haven't got a clue, just need a hint to point me in the right direction. New to all this dirac delta nonsense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you havea copy of Riley, Hobson, Bense? it was good when i did this.

basically the Dirac delta function "is" the continuous analogue of the Kronecker delta.

one definition is:

[itex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \delta(x-x_0) dx=f(x_0)[/itex] for 1D or
[itex]\int \int \int f(r) \delta(r-r_0) dV=f(r_0)[/itex] for 3D

now let's say you have a sphere containing a uniformly distributed charge, the total charge of said sphere is [itex]Q=\int \int \int \rho(r) dV[/itex] by definition where [itex]\rho(r)[/itex] is the charge density inside the sphere.

you're told that instead of having a sphere of uniformly distributed charge, you have instead just a point charge at the centre of the sphere (i.e. located at [itex]r=0[/itex] in that particular coordinate system). In this situation we can describe the charge density as [itex]\rho(r)=q \delta(r)[/itex] where q is the charge of the point charge.

now we want to find the total charge:
[itex]Q=\int \int \int q \delta(r) dV=\int \int \int q \delta(r-0) dV = q[/itex] using the definition of the Dirac delta function.

hopefully that helps as to why you can write [itex]\rho(r)=q \delta(r)[/itex]
 
Think of it this way: For a charged spherical shell of radius R, the volume charge distribution is zero everywhere in space except at r = R where the volume charge distribution is infinite (because the thickness of the shell is zero.) Therefore, we write the volume charge density as

[tex]\rho(r)=A\delta(r - R)[/tex]

If you know that the total charge on the shell is Q, you find constant A by integrating the volume charge distribution over all space (triple integral) and setting it equal to Q.
 
Ok, thanks. That makes sense now; so now I should say, for a volume containing a spherical shell of radius R centered at the origin:

[tex]\int_V \rho\cdot\delta (r-R)\cdot r^2\,dr\,sin\,\theta\, d\theta\, d\varphi=Q[/tex]

[tex]\rho\int_0^\infty r^2 \delta (r-R)\, dr \int_0^\pi sin\,\theta\, d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} \, d\varphi[/tex]

[tex]\rho\cdot R^2\cdot 4\pi = Q[/tex]

Therefore the volume charge density should be [tex]\rho = {Q\over 4\pi R^2}\cdot\delta(r-R)[/tex] for the total charge to come out to Q, right? (Sorry, I'm not very experienced with TeX)
 
One more thing, does this mean that the one-dimensional delta function is endowed with the units of 1/length?
 
Yes, if the independent variable has dimensions of length.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K