Electron number density in fusion plasma

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electron number density in fusion plasma, specifically within the context of the ITER reactor, which has an average electron density of 1020 m-3. The Saha equation is mentioned as a tool for estimating electron density, but it is deemed unsuitable for fully ionized plasmas like those in ITER. Instead, transport theory is highlighted as the appropriate framework for understanding density profiles, accounting for various transport processes such as turbulent and neoclassical transport. The Greenwald limit is also discussed as a critical stability boundary in tokamak reactor design, influencing maximum density calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Saha equation and its applications in plasma physics
  • Familiarity with transport theory in magnetically confined plasmas
  • Knowledge of the Greenwald limit and its implications for tokamak design
  • Experience with plasma fueling techniques such as gas puffing and neutral beam injection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications and limitations of the Saha equation in plasma physics
  • Study transport theory and its role in calculating density profiles in fusion plasmas
  • Examine the Greenwald limit and its impact on tokamak reactor design
  • Explore advanced plasma fueling techniques and their effects on electron density
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in fusion energy, particularly those focused on plasma behavior and tokamak reactor design.

Dr. Octavious
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

Is there a way to calculate/predict the electron number density of a plasma?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, in thermonuclear fusion the plasma is fully ionized. I know in the ITER reactor they have an average electron density of 10^20 m-3. Is the Saha equation able to give me a fair approximation?
 
It depends on the context.

The Saha equation assumes that you have a uniform plasma in thermodynamic equilibrium. It really only takes into account the atomic processes. It's really not the right tool for understanding the density in the core of a magnetically confined plasma such as ITER. The Saha equation is more useful for colder partially ionized plasmas, such as those used in plasma processing. However, my understanding is that even here the Saha equation has limited utility.

The density is something that we can control in fusion experiments. We can fuel an experiment using gas puffing, neutral beams, and pellet injections.

The theoretical calculation of the density in magnetically confined plasmas is the subject of transport theory. This theory tries to calculate the density profile given the density sources and sinks. There are a number of different processes that give rise to different types of transport. For example there is turbulent transport, neoclassical transport, etc. In order to correctly calculate the density you have to correctly account for all the dominate types of transport. This is actually a very difficult problem with many open questions.

In current carrying devices there is also a hard stability boundary that limits the maximum density in a device. This is the Greenwald limit. The Greenwald limit is often used in design studies of tokamak reactors. Here is is assumed that the tokamak operates at some fraction of this limit.
 
Yes I understand. I know the Greenwald limit as a stability boundary and I thought of using this for my calculations. It is hard for an amateur to account for all the possible problems in a tokamak but at least it is fun learning new stuff. I've dealt with many of them in my research but they are so many and complicated in nature. Thank you all for your answers, they were really helpful! I appreciate it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K