Electrostatic Force and Charge Transfer in a Collision between Polystyrene Balls

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the electrostatic force and charge transfer during a collision between two uncharged polystyrene balls. The problem explores the direction of the electrostatic force after electron transfer and the calculation of the number of electrons transferred based on the force and distance between the balls.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the direction of the electrostatic force, noting that one ball becomes positively charged and the other negatively charged after electron transfer. There are attempts to calculate the number of electrons transferred using Coulomb's law, with some participants questioning the assumptions about charge distribution and distance between the charges.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in their calculations for the first two parts of the problem, while others seek clarification on the third part. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of charge distribution and the correct interpretation of distances involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the charge is likely concentrated at the points of contact between the balls, raising questions about how to accurately determine the distance between the charges. The original problem states that the centers of the balls are separated by 7 mm, and participants are working through the implications of this distance in relation to the radii of the balls.

craig.16
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


During a collision between two initially uncharged polystyrene balls of radius 2 mm, some electrons are transferred from one of the balls to the other. In what direction does the resulting electrostatic force between the balls act?

The magnitude of the force between the balls is 0.02 N when their centres are separated by 7 mm. Assuming that the charge is uniformly distributed over the surface of each of the balls, determine the number of electrons that was transferred from one ball to the other in the collision.

As polystyrene does not conduct electricity, it is likely that the charge is in fact concentrated at the points on the two balls which came into contact in the collision. Determine the number of electrons transferred in the collision under this assumption, assuming also that the balls are free to rotate.


Homework Equations


F=(1/4(pi)e0)*(q1q2/r2)


The Attempt at a Solution


For the first part I put the resulting electrostatic force between the balls is acting inward since one ball is now positively charged after losing an electron whereas the other is negatively charged as its gained an electron. Is this correct?

For the 2nd part I used the equation above to get:
0.02=(8.99*109)(q2/(7*10-3)2)
q2=1.09*10-16
q=1.04*10-8
no of electrons=(1.04*10-8)/(1.6*10-19)=6.53*1010
is this correct?

Finally for the 3rd part I haven't got a clue where to start so any hints on how to begin it would be grateful, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well for I and II part you are right!

For the third part even i have no idea, i'll try and get back on this!
 
Good to know I have the first two parts right at least thanks. :smile:
 
The charge on each ball will be on the surface in one location, in some small area (where contact was made). What does that tell you about the distance between the charges for this situation?
 
The distance would be zero but that can't work out because you can't divide by zero.
 
craig.16 said:
The distance would be zero but that can't work out because you can't divide by zero.

Really? How do you work that out from the given information?
 
Honestly It was first instinct barely any thought put into it. The only thing I can think of is a distance of 4mm as its the total of both radius of each ball. But that still doesn't make sense considering its where contact was made and the center of each ball is clearly not where contact was made. I know this answer is probably really obvious but for some reason I can't think of what it will be, sorry.
 
craig.16 said:
Honestly It was first instinct barely any thought put into it. The only thing I can think of is a distance of 4mm as its the total of both radius of each ball. But that still doesn't make sense considering its where contact was made and the center of each ball is clearly not where contact was made. I know this answer is probably really obvious but for some reason I can't think of what it will be, sorry.

To quote the original problem, "their centres are separated by 7 mm". Their radii are 2mm each. The distance between their surfaces is therefore...?
 
Thanks for that. I knew I had a problem with over complicating the working out and not thinking about the basics but I didn't know I was this bad. I'll have to remind myself for future reference to start thinking at the most basic level and work my way up instead of just assuming its harder than what it actually might turn out to be.

o the distance between the surfaces is 3mm and I need to work out how many electrons are transferred. Do I simply use the same equation (couloumbs law) with the same values only the radius is now 3mm instead of 7mm and one of the charges is the answer I got in the first part to work out what the other charge is for the other ball? Then do the same process as in part 2 to work out the number of electrons?
 
  • #10
craig.16 said:
o the distance between the surfaces is 3mm and I need to work out how many electrons are transferred. Do I simply use the same equation (couloumbs law) with the same values only the radius is now 3mm instead of 7mm and one of the charges is the answer I got in the first part to work out what the other charge is for the other ball? Then do the same process as in part 2 to work out the number of electrons?

Think of it as a whole new problem. You've got distance and force, and you want to find the charges. The charges are equal and opposite.
 
  • #11
Just had another go at this question today and worked out where I went wrong on the last part. Thanks for the help though gneill:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K