Electrostatic potential due to a dipole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the electrostatic potential due to a dipole, specifically addressing the equations r1² = r² + a² - 2ar cos(θ) and r2² = r² + a² + 2ar cos(α). Participants clarify the geometric interpretation of these equations, emphasizing the role of the cosine rule in determining the signs of the terms. The confusion arises from the differing signs in the equations, which is resolved by recognizing that cos(180° - θ) = -cos(θ). Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately applying the principles of electrostatics in dipole scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and dipole moments
  • Familiarity with the cosine rule in geometry
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electrostatic potential from dipoles using the cosine rule
  • Learn about vector addition in the context of electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of dipole orientation on electric field calculations
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of cosine functions and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to dipole interactions and vector analysis.

Crystal037
Messages
167
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Find the electrostatic potential due to a dipole
Relevant Equations
V=Q/4*pi*ebselon
IMG_20191209_042703_compress65.jpg

Given here is that by geometry
r1^2 =r^2 +a^2 - 2ar*cos(theta)
But if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r^2 =r1^2 +a^2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
Where alpha is the angle between a and r1. I Don,'t understand how they get it by geometry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crystal037 said:
if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r^2 =r1^2 +a^2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
What vectors are you adding to get that? What has the geometry of a triangle got to do with the direction of a field?
 
Then why at one equation a negative sign is present and on the other equation a positive sign is present in front of the term 2racos(theta)
 
Crystal037 said:
Then why at one equation a negative sign is present and on the other equation a positive sign is present in front of the term 2racos(theta)
I cannot answer that until you explain how you get the equation with the positive sign.
 
I didn't got it. In the book it's simply written that we got it by geometry
 
cos(α) = -cos(180° -α)
 
Crystal037 said:
I didn't got it. In the book it's simply written that we got it by geometry
You don't seem to be understanding my question.
The book gives this equation, with a negative sign, by geometry, and that is quite easily got by the cosine rule:
Crystal037 said:
r12 =r2 +a2 - 2ar*cos(theta)
Then you wrote this equation with a positive sign, and do not explain how you get it:
Crystal037 said:
But if we try to do vector addition then since direction of dipole is upwards then it should be
r2 =r12 +a2 + 2ar1*cos(alpha)
What is alpha? I don't see that in the diagram. Did you mean theta?
If you take the line of length 2a and continue that upwards, then label the angle between that and the line length r1 as alpha then both equations are correct.
 
I have taken alpha as the angle between a and r1. But I was not talking about my equation. In the book itself there are 2equations, if you see the image then you'll see that after they have written by geometry they have written 2 equations:
First is r1^2 =r^2 +a^2 - 2ar cos(theta)
Second is r2^2 =r^2 +a^2 +2arcos(theta)
Now I understood that they have taken cosine rule and cos(180-theta) =-cos(theta)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K