Electrostatic potential problem (got 1/3) correct

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic potential energy of a system of point charges arranged in an equilateral triangle. The specific charge values and configurations are provided, with an emphasis on understanding the implications of positive and negative potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for different configurations of charges, questioning the signs of the potential energy results and the interpretation of negative values in the context of electrostatics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the calculations, while others are exploring the implications of negative potential energy and whether it can be interpreted as a valid outcome in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of an online homework platform, which may impose specific constraints on how answers are interpreted, particularly regarding the sign of potential energy.

hitman0097
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Point charges q1, q2, and q3 are fixed at the vertices of an equilateral triangle whose sides are 2.50 m long. Find the electrostatic potential energy of this system of charges for the following charge values.
a.)q1=q2=q3=3.90uC
I got the right answer for this one 164mJ

b.)q1=q2=3.90uC,q3=-3.90uC
I used \DeltaV=k[(3.90uC^2/2.5m)-3.90uC/2.5]=14080 (or something like that)
then V=q(sum of the charges) which is just 3.90uC * \DeltaV
ans I got was 54.7mJ

c.)q1=q2=-3.90uC, q3=3.90uC
Same method as above.. same answer too.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hitman0097, welcome to PF.
Your answers appear to be correct.
 
hmmm, I got the correct magnitude but the wrong sign? This is a online homework thing. But I don't know how you can minus energy as a answer. Like I know it's the change in energy and you can lose and gain it. But it can't ever be less then zero right?
 
hitman0097 said:
hmmm, I got the correct magnitude but the wrong sign? This is a online homework thing. But I don't know how you can minus energy as a answer. Like I know it's the change in energy and you can lose and gain it. But it can't ever be less then zero right?
In (c) there are two negative charges and one positive charge, So the net potential energy is negative. If you want to keep two positive charges at a certain distance, you have to push them towards each other.
If you want to keep one positive charges and one negative charge at a certain distance, you have to pull them apart from each other. First one you call it as positive PE and second one you call it as negative PE.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K