Electrostatic Series: Does Rubber & Glass Affect Charged Comb?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a charged plastic comb and its interaction with glass and rubber. The hypothesis suggests that the comb will move away from glass and toward rubber due to their differing electronegativities. However, personal experimentation revealed that both materials were attracted to the charged comb, challenging the initial hypothesis. Participants emphasize the value of conducting real experiments to confirm theoretical predictions. The conversation highlights the complexities of electrostatic interactions and the need for practical verification.
jwj11
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is just a thought experiment and I wanted to know if my answer is correct.

If I...
1) Tie a string to one of the plastic combs and suspend this comb from the edge of a table
2) Then rub the suspended plastic comb in wool to give it a negative charge
3) and If I bring a piece of glass near the charged suspended comb
4) or if I bring a piece of rubber near the charged suspended comb

Then for the glass I will observe that the charged comb will move away from the glass.

And for the rubber I will observe that the charged comb moves toward the rubber.

This is because glass has low electronegativity and rubber has a high electronegativity on the electrostatic series?

Would my hypothesis be correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey jwj11,
Why do a thought experiment when you can do a real one. Much more fun and more likely to give the right answer...:wink:
 
because when I did it both of the materials were attracted to the charged comb? How am I suppose to differentiate which is more electronegative?
 
jwj11,

You wrote your hypothesis...
3) and If I bring a piece of glass near the charged suspended comb
4) or if I bring a piece of rubber near the charged suspended comb
Then for the glass I will observe that the charged comb will move away from the glass.
And for the rubber I will observe that the charged comb moves toward the rubber.


and you wrote your experience..
because when I did it both of the materials were attracted to the charged comb

Now what exactly is the problem?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top