Electrostatics -- A charge oscillating through a charged plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a charge -q placed in front of an infinite plane with a charge density σ, focusing on demonstrating the oscillatory motion of the charge as it interacts with the plane. Participants explore the implications of the electric field generated by the plane and its effects on the charge's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the force experienced by the charge and its implications for oscillatory motion. Questions arise regarding the applicability of the electric field expression at varying distances and the nature of oscillatory motion, particularly whether it must be harmonic.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants providing hints and qualitative descriptions of the motion. Multiple interpretations of oscillatory motion are being considered, and the discussion remains open without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for additional information, such as the mass of the particle and specific values for R, σ, and q, to further analyze the problem. The original post is acknowledged to be dated, which may affect the engagement level in the discussion.

Apashanka das
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charge -q placed in front of an infinite plane of charge density σ
To show the oscillatory motion of the charge -q
It is allowed to impinge through charged plane

Homework Equations


Electric field in front of a charged plane is σ/2ε0

The Attempt at a Solution


Force experienced by the charge -q is -qσ/2ε0 towards the plane
Actually I didn't find any hints to prove the oscillatory motion of the charge -q
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apashanka das said:
Force experienced by the charge -q is -qσ/2ε0 towards the plane
Actually I didn't find any hints to prove the oscillatory motion of the charge -q
Do you realize these two lines are contradictory ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Apashanka das said:
Actually I didn't find any hints to prove the oscillatory motion of the charge -q
Hint: Suppose you release the charge from rest at initial distance x0 from the plane. Describe the ensuing motion qualitatively then quantitatively. Keep in mind that the charge is allowed to go through the plane.
 
BvU said:
Do you realize these two lines are contradictory ?
yes that electric field is applicable , very near to the plane
But then what will be the electric field at an appreciable distance
 
Distance doesn't appear in the field expression !
For me that makes sense: if the sheet is infinite size, it looks the same, whatever the distance of the viewer from the plane...
 
BvU said:
Distance doesn't appear in the field expression !
For me that makes sense: if the sheet is infinite size, it looks the same, whatever the distance of the viewer from the plane...
yes for infinite plane the field will be same irrespective of the distance from it ,but for oscillatory motion the force should vary linrearly with distance but that doesn't happen here actually ,then what could be the reason for its oscillatory motion?
 
Apashanka das said:
... oscillatory motion the force should vary linrearly with distance ...
Not necessarily. Oscillatory means repeating with a definite period. You are thinking of harmonic oscillatory motion which is not the case here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and BvU
Oscillatory motion does not necessarily imply purely sinusoidal motion. As kuruman said. Here you have to find the time taken by the particle from the initial position x=R to the position x=0 and then multiply the result with 4 to obtain the time period.
 
Priesh said:
Oscillatory motion does not necessarily imply purely sinusoidal motion. As kuruman said. Here you have to find the time taken by the particle from the initial position x=R to the position x=0 and then multiply the result with 4 to obtain the time period.
Check.
You need to know mass of particle as well as R, ##\sigma## and q. though.
 
  • #10
Please note that the original post is more than two years old. Let's all agree to agree until OP gives renewed signs of life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and rude man

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K