Electrostatics, finding velocity of proton

Click For Summary
A proton with 6.4 x 10^-16 J of kinetic energy is accelerated by a potential difference of 5,000 V, leading to a calculation of its final speed. The correct approach involves understanding the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, specifically that the gain in kinetic energy equals the loss in potential energy. The initial speed of the proton must be considered, as the final speed should logically be greater. Misapplication of the formula and signs led to incorrect calculations. Ultimately, focusing on the physics principles rather than just plugging in numbers is crucial for accurate results.
physics604
Messages
92
Reaction score
2
1. A moving proton has 6.4 x 10-16 J of kinetic energy. The proton is accelerated by a potential difference of 5 000 V between parallel plates. The proton emerges from the parallel plates with what speed?

a) 1.3 x 106 m/s
b) 8.8 x 105 m/s
c)1.8 x 106 m/s
d) 9.8 x 105 m/s

Homework Equations



\DeltaEk + \DeltaEp = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



Eki + Ekf = -Ep
6.4×10-16 + 1/2mv2 = -Q\Deltav

v= √ [(-1.6x10-19×-5000)-6.4x10-16 ×2 / 1.67x10-27] = 437740.5241...

My answer doesn't match with any of the responses. What did I do wrong?
 

Attachments

  • diagram.gif
    diagram.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 660
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you have misplaced a minus sign or three.
I suspect you have applied the formula without understanding it.

Derive the relation you need using:
Gain in kinetic energy = loss in potential energy

Hint:
what is the initial speed of the proton?
should the final speed be greater than or less than this?
what does this say about the final kinetic energy vs the initial kinetic energy?
how does this relate to the change in potential energy (careful)?
 
Okay, I get it!

\DeltaEk = Ekf - Eki

I just used that part of the formula wrong.
 
Though had you gone to the physics first, you wouldn't have needed to know how to use any particular formula.
You can get a long way just looking for equation to stick the numbers you have into - but that way of thinking will always bite you eventually.

But "no worries" aye?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
46K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K