ElementaryFunctions/Exp/06/GraphingOnTheComplexPlane

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the visualization of the function f(z) = e^z on the complex plane, exploring how different lines and values map to the plane. Participants also consider methods for representing the "density" of the function's values and share resources for graphing complex functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their visualization of the function, noting that the imaginary axis bends into the unit circle and that vertical lines with real values greater than 0 bend into larger circles, while those with values less than 0 bend into smaller circles.
  • Another participant clarifies that vertical lines are "wrapped around" into circles and discusses the injectivity of the function on a horizontal strip of the complex plane.
  • A participant introduces the concept of topology to explain how the mapping of the strip to the complex plane can be visualized, although they later correct themselves regarding the homeomorphic nature of the regions involved.
  • Several participants share links to resources for graphing complex functions, indicating that there are tools available for visualizing these concepts.
  • One participant expresses interest in representing the "density" of function values, suggesting a perpendicular "density" axis for visualization purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the visualization of the function and the implications of topology, with some agreeing on certain aspects while others provide corrections or alternative interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best methods for visualizing density and the exact nature of the mappings involved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the mappings and the continuity of the inverse function, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in complex analysis, visualization of mathematical functions, and topology, as well as individuals seeking resources for graphing complex functions.

Saint Medici
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
During a conversation I had yesterday, a math professor I occasionally meet with mentioned in passing, "and you might want to try to graph f(z)=e^z on the complex plane...hm...yes...anyway..." (where "z" is complex). So I sat down at Taco Bell yesterday to think about it, and, for a few minutes today at home on my couch, I gesticulated wildly, bending the coordinate grid as best I could without paper. I came up with this: the imaginary axis bends into the unit circle; all lines with constant real values greater than 0 (vertical lines) bend into circles larger than the unit circle; all vertical lines with real values less than 0 bend into circles smaller than the unit circle; all horizontal lines become rays that pass through the angle that corresponds to their imaginary part and almost, but don't quite, touch the origin. Now, my question is, how accurate is my visualization? I don't want to draw it for fear that anything I draw will become too cluttered, but I also don't want to be walking around with the wrong picture of this function in my head. Can anyone either confirm or correct me as necessary? Also, I know there are programs out there that do this sort of thing for you; could anyone direct me to an image of this graph? And, also, one last question: I don't know how to ask this properly, but is there any way to make a representation of the "density" of the values of this function? Because in my head I have the entire negative real axis compressed into values that take up a finite area while the entire positive axis gets free room to roam. Maybe it's a meaningless thought, but, just for visualization purposes, is there a way to add a "density" axis that runs perpendicular to the complex value-plane? Personally, I think it would be pretty. If that makes any sense whatsoever.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The most common plot of the complex plane is to express the complex number as z=x+iy, Then plot x and y on the Cartesian plane.
 
You might find http://www.mai.liu.se/~halun/complex/domain_coloring-unicode.html interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saint Medici,

Your vision is correct. (Although instead of saying vertical lines are 'bend' into circles, I'd say they are 'wrapped around' into circles).
Notice that the function is not injective on C,
but it is injective on a horizontal strip (couldn't get brackets to work for set notation):
S_a=\left(z:a<Im(z)\leq a +2\pi\right)
This entire strip gets mapped onto the complex plane (without the origin).

Now suppose we take a=0.
So we have that part of the plane with 0<Im(z)\leq 2\pi.
Try to imagine how this strip gets deformed into a plane with a hole in it.

A vertical line in this strip goes to a circle on the plane. So take the bottom part
and tape it to to the upper part (think of it as a piece of paper or rubber which you can roll so you get a tube).
then you have a cylinder. Now squeeze the left side of the cylinder and stretch the
right side (from the inside) so you get the plane with a hole in the middle.

What I've just done is actually Topology (great fun!) and in mathematical terms it says that the strip is homeomorph with the plane*. (homeomorph here means that the strip and the plane (without the orgin) can be mapped into each other by a continuous invertible function with a continuous inverse). Geometrically, the function is stretching and bending the domain into the codomain.

One of my math teachers said topology is rubbermath. We may bend and stretch, but not cut or tear.

Okay, I've digressed, but topology is always a great way to visualise what functions do!

*EDIT: I noticed an error in my post. The regions are not homeomorphic, because it's inverse (which would be the logarithm) is not continuous. You have to 'cut' the plane to get the strip back. But the construction would still work...
 
Last edited:
Muzza, that is a really nice link.
Thanks,
Paul.
 
Although I am sure working it out yourself is probably best, here is a nice site to take a gander at from time to time: http://functions.wolfram.com/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K