MHB Elements of the form a/b in an integral domain - simple question

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In Alaca and Williams' (A&W) book: Introductory Algebraic Number Theory , Theorem 1.2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 3456Without any earlier definition or clarification, A&W refer to $$a/p$$ and $$b/p$$ (see text above) ... BUT ... how should we regard such elements? What exactly do they mean and how do we know they exist?

That is, is $$a/p$$ simply shorthand for an element $$x$$ where $$a = px$$?

Further, presumably using the notation $$a/p$$ implies that $$p^{-1}$$ exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?

Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In Alaca and Williams' (A&W) book: Introductory Algebraic Number Theory , Theorem 1.2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 3456Without any earlier definition or clarification, A&W refer to $$a/p$$ and $$b/p$$ (see text above) ... BUT ... how should we regard such elements? What exactly do they mean and how do we know they exist?

That is, is $$a/p$$ simply shorthand for an element $$x$$ where $$a = px$$?

Further, presumably using the notation $$a/p$$ implies that $$p^{-1}$$ exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?

Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...

Peter

Since $D$ is an integral domain, and $p\neq 0$, there is a unique $c\in D$ such that $pc=a$ if $p|a$.

So when we write $a/p$, I think we mean $c$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top