Elements of the form a/b in an integral domain - simple question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of elements expressed as $$a/p$$ and $$b/p$$ in the context of integral domains, specifically referencing Theorem 1.2.1 from Alaca and Williams' book, "Introductory Algebraic Number Theory." It is established that in an integral domain, if $$p \neq 0$$ and $$p$$ divides $$a$$, then there exists a unique element $$c$$ such that $$pc = a$$. Therefore, the notation $$a/p$$ is effectively shorthand for this element $$c$$, assuming the existence of $$p^{-1}$$ is not a requirement in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral domains in abstract algebra
  • Familiarity with the notation and properties of divisibility
  • Knowledge of the concept of unique factorization in algebraic structures
  • Basic comprehension of algebraic number theory as presented in Alaca and Williams' work
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integral domains and their implications on divisibility
  • Explore the concept of unique elements in algebraic structures
  • Review Theorem 1.2.1 in "Introductory Algebraic Number Theory" for deeper insights
  • Investigate the conditions under which inverses exist in integral domains
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators seeking clarity on the interpretation of elements in integral domains, particularly those studying algebraic number theory.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In Alaca and Williams' (A&W) book: Introductory Algebraic Number Theory , Theorem 1.2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 3456Without any earlier definition or clarification, A&W refer to $$a/p$$ and $$b/p$$ (see text above) ... BUT ... how should we regard such elements? What exactly do they mean and how do we know they exist?

That is, is $$a/p$$ simply shorthand for an element $$x$$ where $$a = px$$?

Further, presumably using the notation $$a/p$$ implies that $$p^{-1}$$ exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?

Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In Alaca and Williams' (A&W) book: Introductory Algebraic Number Theory , Theorem 1.2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 3456Without any earlier definition or clarification, A&W refer to $$a/p$$ and $$b/p$$ (see text above) ... BUT ... how should we regard such elements? What exactly do they mean and how do we know they exist?

That is, is $$a/p$$ simply shorthand for an element $$x$$ where $$a = px$$?

Further, presumably using the notation $$a/p$$ implies that $$p^{-1}$$ exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?

Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...

Peter

Since $D$ is an integral domain, and $p\neq 0$, there is a unique $c\in D$ such that $pc=a$ if $p|a$.

So when we write $a/p$, I think we mean $c$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K