High School Elevator Question -- What does a downward acceleration mean?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of downward acceleration in an upward-moving elevator. A downward acceleration indicates that the elevator is ascending but decelerating, approaching a stop at a higher floor. Participants emphasize the importance of defining the coordinate system, recommending that upward be treated as the positive direction for clarity. In this context, a downward acceleration of 1.4 m/s² translates to -1.4 m/s² when upward is designated as positive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams and their application in physics.
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems and how to define positive and negative directions.
  • Basic mathematical skills for interpreting acceleration values.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's laws of motion to grasp the relationship between acceleration and velocity.
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams in various scenarios.
  • Explore the implications of different coordinate system conventions in physics problems.
  • Practice problems involving acceleration and velocity in upward and downward motion contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding motion dynamics, particularly in scenarios involving elevators and similar systems.

jwviviang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean? When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jwviviang said:
TL;DR Summary: I just have a question (I don't know how to word this summary, sorry)

If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller, vanhees71 and russ_watters
jwviviang said:
If an elevator is moving upward, what does a downward acceleration mean?
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.

jwviviang said:
When applying the free body diagram, will the positive direction be upwards since the elevator is moving up?
You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.
 
  • Like
Likes jwviviang and vanhees71
A.T. said:
If acceleration has a component opposite to velocity, then the object is slowing down.You are free to choose the orientation of your coordinate system axes, as long you apply that convention consistently.

Dale said:
It means that it is going up, but slowing down. Like it is going up from the lobby and about to stop at some upper floor

In principle you can have up be either positive or negative, whatever you prefer. However, I personally think that having up be negative is confusing, so I would recommend usually choosing up positive.

So your acceleration would be negative and your velocity would be positive.
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
 
jwviviang said:
I see now. So if a question says (for example) "...moving upward elevator...if the elevator has a downward acceleration a = 1.4 m/s^2..." the downward acceleration means a = -1.4 m/s^2?
Yes, in the usual setup with up being positive.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
847
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K