Eliminating Parameter for Calculating Graphs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves eliminating the parameter from the given parametric equations x=2e^t and y=2e^-t, with the goal of expressing y in terms of x. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the resulting equation and its graphical representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the equations using logarithms to eliminate the parameter, leading to a derived equation that does not match their calculator's graph. Some participants question the correctness of the transformations applied, while others provide alternative methods for elimination.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the transformations involved in eliminating the parameter. Some guidance has been offered regarding alternative approaches to reach the correct expression for y in terms of x. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the derived equations, particularly concerning the behavior of the graph near x=0.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the behavior of the graph at x=0, with participants questioning the implications of the parameterization and the resulting function's domain.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Eliminate the parameter given
x=2e^t, y=2e^-t

The Attempt at a Solution



lnx = ln2 + t, so t = lnx - ln 2

This gives:

y=2e^(ln2-lnx)
y=2(e^ln2 * e^-lnx)
y= -4x

This does not, however, match the graph of the parametric function on my calculator. Have I made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e^{-\ln{x}} \neq -x
 
Last edited:
No, it's 1/x, so y=4/x must be the correct solution (for x bigger than 0)

The graph doesn't seem to start at x=0 though...
 
Last edited:
You didn't need to go through the "ln" business. If x= 2et then xe-t= 2 so e-t= 2/x and y= 2e-t= 2(2/x)= 4/x.

Obviously, the can't "start at x= 0"- why does that bother you? x= 2et and et is never 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K