Elliptic Integrals: Arc Length of Ellipses and Elliptic Curves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Elliptic integrals are essential in calculating the arc length of ellipses, a problem first addressed by mathematicians Fagnano and Leonhard Euler. Contrary to some beliefs, elliptic integrals are not simply related to elliptic curves, as they specifically pertain to the arc length of ellipses, which cannot be expressed with a straightforward formula. The area of an ellipse, defined by the equation \(\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1\), is easily calculated as \(\pi ab\), while the circumference remains complex. Additionally, elliptic functions serve as the inverse functions to elliptic integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the concepts of elliptic integrals
  • Knowledge of the equation of an ellipse
  • Basic grasp of elliptic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of elliptic integrals
  • Explore the relationship between elliptic integrals and elliptic functions
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating the arc length of ellipses
  • Learn about the applications of elliptic integrals in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and professionals in fields requiring geometric analysis, particularly those focused on the properties of ellipses and elliptic functions.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_integral:

In integral calculus, elliptic integrals originally arose in connection with the problem of giving the arc length of an ellipse and were first studied by Fagnano and Leonhard Euler.

Is it just me, or does it seem like there is an easier way to find the arc length of an ellipse? I thought elliptic integrals arose in giving the arc length of elliptic curves, which as far as I know are a lot different than ellipses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought elliptic integrals arose in giving the arc length of elliptic curves, which as far as I know are a lot different than ellipses.

But an ellipse is an elliptic curve! :)
 
I suspect apmcavoy was thinking of "elliptic functions", as in number theory, which are quite different. In any case, he is wrong. Elliptic integrals did, indeed, arise from trying to find the arc length of an ellipse which is NOT as simple as he seems to think. The arclength of an ellipse cannot be written in any simple formula.

(The area is very simple. The area of the ellipse \frac{x^2}{a^2}+ \frac{y^2}{b^2}= 1 is just \pi ab. The distance around (circumference?) an ellipse is not.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
I suspect apmcavoy was thinking of "elliptic functions", as in number theory, which are quite different. In any case, he is wrong. Elliptic integrals did, indeed, arise from trying to find the arc length of an ellipse which is NOT as simple as he seems to think. The arclength of an ellipse cannot be written in any simple formula.

(The area is very simple. The area of the ellipse \frac{x^2}{a^2}+ \frac{y^2}{b^2}= 1 is just \pi ab. The distance around (circumference?) an ellipse is not.)


Elliptic functions are the inverse functions to elliptic integrals.

sn^{-1}(x) = \int^x_0 \frac{dt}{\sqrt{(1-t^2)}\sqrt{(1-k^2t^2)}}, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K