Is My Calculation of Bar Elongation Under Load Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter togo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elongation Load
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of bar elongation under load is confirmed to be 0.804 mm, based on a modulus of elasticity (E) of 114 GPa. Consistent unit usage is critical, with recommendations to use Newtons (N), millimeters (mm), and megapascals (MPa) for clarity. The forces acting on the beam include an 80 kN load affecting the first 0.25 m, a 40 kN load acting over 0.5 m, and a 110 kN load impacting the entire length. Proper formatting of numerical values and units is essential for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modulus of elasticity (E) in materials science
  • Familiarity with unit conversion and consistent unit usage
  • Knowledge of axial forces and their impact on structural elements
  • Ability to interpret N-diagrams for axial force distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of axial load calculations in structural engineering
  • Learn about consistent unit usage in engineering calculations
  • Explore the creation and interpretation of N-diagrams
  • Research the effects of different materials' modulus of elasticity on structural performance
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students studying material mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those involved in load calculations and material property analysis.

togo
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
k2icfs.jpg


4qq1bb.jpg


I may be doing it correctly, but the number seems way to small for the initial calculation. Plus I am really not sure how to factor in those other forces. Modulus of elasticity E = 114 GPa (if unclear)

thanks

ps. answer is 0.804 mm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use consistent units. A Pascal is a N/m^2, so don't use mm, you'll just trip yourself up.

So you've got:
Ao=.0009 m^2
AB=BC=CD=.25 m
E=114 x 10^9 Pa
etc.

As for the other forces, they work in basically the same way, but each force will work on progressively more of the beam. The 80kN will work on the first .25m (as you have worked out), the backwards-acting 40kN will then have .5m to work on, and the 110kN works on the whole thing.
 
Use consistent units. Using mm is a good choice here. I would use N, mm, MPa. Notice, only E and length in post 1 are inconsistent. Below is an example of consistent units, using mm.

80 000 N
Ao = 900 mm^2
AB = BC = CD = 250 mm
E = 114 000 MPa​

(1) By the way, always leave a space between a numeric value and its following unit symbol. E.g., 80 kN, not 80kN. See the international standard for writing units[/color] (ISO 31-0[/color]). Or see the first image in post 1 for the correct form.

(2) Numbers less than 1 must always have a zero before the decimal point. E.g., 0.25, not .25. See the above links, or any credible textbook.

(3) Also, Pascal is a man, whereas pascal (Pa) is a unit of pressure or stress. Always use correct capitalization and spelling of units.
 
Last edited:
I would start by drawing the N-diagram. That is, a graph of how the axial force varies from one end to the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
10K