EM radiation => Self propagating wave ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the characterization of electromagnetic (EM) radiation as a self-propagating wave. Participants explore the implications of the term "self" in this context, questioning its appropriateness and the underlying mechanics of wave propagation in a vacuum.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that the term "self" should be removed from descriptions of EM radiation, suggesting that it implies a misunderstanding of wave mechanics.
  • Another participant asserts that EM radiation is indeed a self-propagating wave, questioning the concerns raised about the term.
  • A clarification is made regarding the components of EM waves, correcting a reference to "grav and mag" to "elec and mag."
  • Concerns are raised about the cyclic reasoning involved in describing how EM waves propagate, with one participant expressing uncertainty about the mechanisms of wave movement through space.
  • Another participant explains that "self" in this context means the wave propagates independently, without the need for external interactions, drawing a parallel to the concept of "self-similarity."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the term "self" in describing EM radiation. Some agree with the notion of self-propagation, while others challenge its implications and the clarity of the explanation surrounding wave propagation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of understanding the coupling and causality of the electric and magnetic components of EM waves, indicating that there are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and mechanics involved.

Sirandar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Both Wikipedia and my educators called electromagnetic radiation a self propagating wave.


I would suggest that the word self be removed from wikipedia at least. There is no self in a wave. Even the word "coupled" or "causally related" are risky WRT the grav and mag components as I don't think anyone understands the coupling or causality.

Saying that EM is a wave-particle with grav and mag at right angles that can propgate in a vacuum contains the same amount of real information and is more reflective of what is known IMO. (perp to line travel too)

Is there any merit to this thought?
 
Science news on Phys.org
... EM rad is a self-propagating wave. What's the problem?

I think any non-trivial solutions to laplace's equations are self-propagating waves.
 
Sirandar said:
Saying that EM is a wave-particle with grav and mag at right angles

I think you meant "elec and mag" not "grav and mag".
 
jtbell said:
I think you meant "elec and mag" not "grav and mag".
Correct
 
zhermes said:
... EM rad is a self-propagating wave. What's the problem?

I think any non-trivial solutions to laplace's equations are self-propagating waves.

The self propagating term uses the word self to try to explain something that hasn't been explained properly. A wave has no self. They travel though a vacuum because they do.

You could easily say that an EM has two functions that interconvert and this makes it self propagating, but seems to me that is cyclic thinking and I personally can't see how that explains how it can move through a vacuum.

Don't really know how wave A moves though space
Don't really know how wave B moves though space

Wave A creates Wave B and Wave B creates Wave A, so that explains how both waves move though space.

Just doesn't sit right

My 2 cents
 
The word "self" in this context doesn't imply any consciousness, but means the wave propagates "by itself" without the need for any interactions with anything else. We also use self in this context when we say something is "self-similar". Saying the Mandelbrot set is "self-similar" doesn't imply that it is a conscious being, just that it is similar to itself.
 
phyzguy said:
means the wave propagates without the need for any interactions with anything else

That definition fits
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
509
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K