EM: Uniform plane wave incident on normal boundry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a uniform plane wave incident on a perfectly conducting boundary at z = 0. The incident electric field is given by E_i = 40cos(wt - Bz)a_x + 30sin(wt - Bz)a_y. The reflected electric field E_r and magnetic field H_r are derived using boundary conditions, which state that the tangential components of the electric field must equal zero at the boundary. The reflection coefficient is -1, indicating complete reflection without transmission. The discussion highlights the importance of using Maxwell's equations to derive the magnetic field components in response to the incident electric fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions for electromagnetic fields
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, particularly cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poynting vector in electromagnetic waves
  • Learn about the implications of boundary conditions on electric and magnetic fields
  • Explore the concept of reflection coefficients in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the behavior of electromagnetic waves at conducting boundaries
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetic theory, wave propagation, and boundary value problems in physics.

Alxb577
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a uniform plane wave in air as:
E_i=40cos(wt- Bz)a_x +30sin(wt- Bz)a_y
(a) Find H_i
(b) If the wave encounters a perfectly conducting plate normal to the z axis at z = 0, find
the reflected wave E_r and H_r.
(c) What are the total E and H fields for z < 0?

Homework Equations



[1] direction of H is the cross product of the direction of propagation with the direction of the E wave.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
This problem should be really easy for me but I'm not getting the boundary conditions I feel like I should have at z=0.

The E wave is propagating in the + z direction with +x and +y components.

Because of equation [1] the corresponding H wave will have corresponding +y and -x components. {Note I don't really care about the magnitude for now}.

Because the wave hits a perfect conducting boundary, the reflection coefficient is -1.

Now the reflected E wave would be propagating in the - z direction with -x and -y components.

From equation [1] the H wave will have corresponding +y and -x components.

Since none of the waves are transmitted and both the E and H are tangential to the boundary at z=0, The sum of the incident and reflective wave of both the E and H wave must be zero, correct? I don't believe there is a surface current or anything like that either.

If you look at the components of the E incident +x , +y and reflected -x , -y the boundary conditions are satisfied at z = 0; Now looking at the H incident +y , -x and reflected +y , -x they are not satisfied.

If there is something dumb I'm doing please let me know, I've spent way too long on this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(b)
Alxb577 said:

Homework Statement



Given a uniform plane wave in air as:
E_i=40cos(wt- Bz)a_x +30sin(wt- Bz)a_y
(a) Find H_i
(b) If the wave encounters a perfectly conducting plate normal to the z axis at z = 0, find
the reflected wave E_r and H_r.
(c) What are the total E and H fields for z < 0?

Homework Equations


[1] direction of H is the cross product of the direction of propagation with the direction of the E wave.
No, the direction of propagation is the cross product of the E and H fields: P = E x H. Still, you got the right polarizations for the incident E and H fields.
Since none of the waves are transmitted and both the E and H are tangential to the boundary at z=0, The sum of the incident and reflective wave of both the E and H wave must be zero, correct? I don't believe there is a surface current or anything like that either.
I assume you mean at the boundary. Certainly the sum of incident and reflected waves is not everywhere zero outside the conductor!
The boundary condition is for Etangential = 0 but not for Htangential. Once you have the reflected E components the H components are solved for by Maxwell's del x E = - ∂B/∂t. When you do that you will find that the H components for each incident wave double at the interface, rather than go to zero.

There is actually infinite current density AT the interface; penetration though is zero. One of those infinity times zero deals!

(a) Use the Poynting vector to determine the spatial direction of Hi. Temporally you know there is what phase shift between the two E vectors? And for each E of the two vectors what is the phase shift between it and its companion H vector in a non-conducting medium?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K