EM Waves Penetration: Frequency Effects & Atmospheric Limitations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the penetration capabilities of electromagnetic (EM) waves at varying frequencies and the factors influencing material attenuation. It establishes that higher frequency EM waves, such as microwaves, can penetrate certain materials like haze more effectively than visible light, while gamma rays face significant atmospheric limitations. Key factors affecting attenuation include reflection at material boundaries, multi-reflection within the material, and absorption, which is highly dependent on the material's properties, particularly its permeability. The relationship between frequency and attenuation is complex and non-linear.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with material properties, specifically permeability
  • Knowledge of attenuation factors in wave propagation
  • Basic principles of reflection and absorption in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the absorption spectrum of various materials using the Water Absorption Spectrum as a reference
  • Explore the impact of frequency on electromagnetic wave penetration in different media
  • Study the principles of wave impedance and its effect on reflection at material boundaries
  • Investigate non-linear relationships in material attenuation across different frequencies
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers involved in telecommunications, materials science, and atmospheric studies will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on the behavior of EM waves in various environments.

Kyoma
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
When an EM wave has a higher frequency, it is able to penetrate materials more easily.

However, why does a microwave able to penetrate haze while visible light can't? Why visible light is able to enter our atmosphere while those of gamma can't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyoma said:
When an EM wave has a higher frequency, it is able to penetrate materials more easily.
This is not generally true. E.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Water_absorption_spectrum.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First assuming TEM mode (no field component in the propagation direction).

In addition to the above poster, the attenuation of a material could be viewed upon as the sum of three things
1) Reflection, at the first boundary of the material
2) Multi-reflection, inside the material between the boundaries of the material
3) Absorption in the material itself

1) and 3) tend to increase the attenuation and 2) increase it.
1) is often just a simple function of the different wave impedances of the two regions (that is from where the wave came from and into the material we are talking about).

The absorption (3) is highly dependent on the material parameters in our "shield material".
E.g. to attenuate low frequency magnetic fields, you need a material with a high permeability value. Also all of this is of course frequency dependent, HOWEVER you cannot assume it to be linear :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K