EMF induced by a magnet falling through a coil

AI Thread Summary
When a magnet falls through a coil, the induced electromotive force (emf) and magnetic flux behave in distinct ways. The emf is zero when the magnet is centered in the coil because the opposing flux changes cancel each other out, despite the effective flux being at its maximum. As the magnet exits the coil, the effective flux becomes negative due to the greater contribution from the top half of the magnet. The induced emf is determined by the rate of change of flux, not the total flux itself, which is crucial for understanding the relationship between the two. This discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the flux dynamics to grasp the underlying physics.
zee123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How will the flux and emf graphs look like for a magnet that falls freely through a coil
Relevant Equations
E= -NBA/time taken , flux=BA
I've been told that if you drop a magnet through a coil the induced emf and flux graphs would look like this:
1615028265880.png

I understand that when the bar magnet is in the middle of the coil the emf induced is zero as flux change in top and bottom is in opposite directions but why is effective flux maximum when emf induced is zero, shouldn't the effective flux be zero as well? And, in the second half of the magnets jounery shouldn't the effective flux be negative as more of the flux linkage is contributed by the top half of the magnet when it is leaving the coil?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A better definition for the induced emf would be ##E=-\frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. Check with this one.
 
Since,as Gordianus says, the emf depends on the rate of change of flux linkage, it can help to think of the emf graph as the gradient of the flux graph (but remembering the negative sign).
 
Or you can view the bottom graph as the integral over time of the top graph (still remembering the negative sign).
 
I hope this might provide a bit of physical/geometrical insight, to complement the mathematical insights from the other answers.

Remember it is the rate of change of flux, not the amount flux, which determines the induced emf.

Look at these diagrams:

Magnet.jpg

Fig. 1 shows the field (lines of flux) around a bar magnet. I haven’t put arrows on but you easily add them mentally if you want.

Fig. 2 shows only the lines of flux. Note each is actually a complete loop and each loop passes through the magnet.

Fig. 3 shows the lines of flux with the magnet just above the coil (sides of coil shown in red). Note there are only 2 lines of flux inside the coil. A small movement down will quickly increase this number, giving a large induced emf.

Fig. 4 shows the lines of flux with the magnet centred on the coil’s centre. There are now 8 lines of flux (maximum) inside the coil’s area. A small movement down will not change this number. So the induced emf = 0 even though the flux is maximum.

(As an additional note, if the there were a complete flux loop inside the coil it wouild have zero contribution to the net flux through the coil - because the upwards section cancels the downwards section.)

Hope that all makes sense.
Magnet.jpg
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top