Energy and environmental engineering silly question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around clarifying the differences between two assignment questions related to emissions from a coal mine. The first question addresses methods to contain gases within the mine, while the second focuses on managing gases that have escaped. There is confusion regarding whether particulate emissions, such as dust from loading trains, fall under mining operations. Additionally, the participant questions if "processing" is considered part of "mining operations." Understanding these distinctions is crucial for completing the assignment effectively.
t0mm02
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am sorry if this question looks silly but my tutor has not replied yet and I need to work it out as soon as I can. Could someone tell me if they see any difference question 1 and question 2? Because I genuinely don't and it is driving me crazy. The assignment is about a coal mine and how to prevent emissions
IMG-20210502-WA0004.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
1. Focuses on keeping the gasses still inside the mine.
2. Focuses on doing something with gasses out of the mine.
 
It sounds to me like they are differentiating between gaseous and particulate emissions.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Tom.G
Loading trains can raise dust. This might not be considered part of "mining operations".

Is "processing" included in "mining operations"?
 

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Thread 'Dry sump pump issue'

I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
View full post »

Similar threads

Need help for INTERVIEW an environmental engineer of technology
Replies
1
Views
4K
Calculating how a car consumes energy (gasoline)
Replies
8
Views
839
Programs Broad Interest and Environmental Focus
Replies
1
Views
1K
Considering Switching from Physics to Computer Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Can Energy Be Saved When Using an Air Pump to Lift a 5kg Weight?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Programs Environmental Solutions and Semiconductors: Research Interests and Career Goals
Replies
2
Views
2K
Is Environmental Engineering the Best Path for Clean Energy Careers?
Replies
1
Views
3K
From Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology to Physics?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I in deciding my specialization
Replies
5
Views
2K
Engineering Chemistry or Engineering major for environmentally-minded?
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top