Energy change for a charged particle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy change of a charged particle interacting with electric and magnetic fields, specifically exploring the rate of energy change expressed as $$\frac{dE}{dt}=\vec{v}\cdot \vec{E}$$. Participants are examining the implications of this relationship without introducing coordinates or basis vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of total energy and the differentiation of potential energy in relation to kinetic energy. There are questions about the necessity of assuming a uniform electric field and the implications of integrating the electric field and magnetic force. Some participants express uncertainty regarding the conditions under which the magnetic force contributes to work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some have suggested reconsidering the integration approach, while others have clarified that the magnetic force does not perform work on the particle. There is a recognition of the need to focus on the infinitesimal displacement and the work done by the electric force.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the assumptions about the electric field and the role of magnetic fields in energy change. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and relationships involved in the energy dynamics of charged particles.

Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Without introducing any coordinates or basis vectors, show that, when a charged particle interacts with electric and magnetic fields, its energy changes at a rate $$\frac{dE}{dt}=\vec{v}\cdot \vec{E} $$

Homework Equations


##E_{kin} + E_{pot}= En =## const (1)
##E_{pot}=\vec{r}\cdot\vec{E}## (2)...suppose homogenic electric field and also that magnetic field does not affect magnitude of velocity. ##E## describes electric field

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all I suppose they ask on kinetic energy. Total energy is conserved. Then I put (2) in (1) and differentiate to get:
$$\frac{dE_k}{dt}=-\frac{d}{dt}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{E}). $$
I hope, a minus sign vanish in opposite definition of vectors \vec{r}. I hope in homogenic electric field is ##\vec{E}=##const. than
$$\frac{dE_k}{dt}=\vec{v}\cdot\vec{E}. $$
Is it allright?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to assume a uniform E field, and therefore you don't need to assume that -r⋅E is the potential energy.

The rate at which the energy of the particle increases is the rate at which the electromagnetic force does work on the particle. So, consider the electromagnetic force and the amount of work it does when the particle undergoes a small displacement dr.
 
TSny said:
You don't need to assume a uniform E field, and therefore you don't need to assume that -r⋅E is the potential energy.

The rate at which the energy of the particle increases is the rate at which the electromagnetic force does work on the particle. So, consider the electromagnetic force and the amount of work it does when the particle undergoes a small displacement dr.
Aha I see, so ##\frac{dE}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\int{\vec{E}d\vec{r}}+\frac{d}{dt}\int{(\vec{v}\times\vec{B})d\vec{r}}##, but now ##\vec{E}## is not constant and integration cannot be done so easy. How may I now get a result? Honestly now I'm not sure why is the latter term zero (how prove it).
 
I don't understand why you are integrating. To get the rate of change of energy, you just need to consider an infinitesimal displacement dr of the particle during an infinitesimal time dt. If you have a force F that acts on a particle, how much work does F do on the particle when the particle moves through a displacement dr?
 
Vrbic said:
Honestly now I'm not sure why is the latter term zero (how prove it)
What do you know about magnetic fields and work? What is the direction of ##\vec{v}\times\vec{B}## and ##\vec{r}##?
 
TSny said:
I don't understand why you are integrating. To get the rate of change of energy, you just need to consider an infinitesimal displacement dr of the particle during an infinitesimal time dt. If you have a force F that acts on a particle, how much work does F do on the particle when the particle moves through a displacement dr?
Ou yes ##dE=dW=\vec{E}d\vec{r}## sorry I have to thing.
 
NFuller said:
What do you know about magnetic fields and work? What is the direction of ##\vec{v}\times\vec{B}## and ##\vec{r}##?
Hmm again, more thinging. Direction of ##\vec{v}## is same as ##\vec{r}##. Cross product ##\vec{v}\times\vec{B}## results in ortogonal to both of them i.e. also to ##\vec{r}## i.e. dot product is zero.
Thank you both of you.
 
Right. The magnetic force doesn't do any work. So, the change in energy is due solely to the work done by the electric force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vrbic

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K