Energy conservation law problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves a ball moving inside a ring of radius R, which is initially stationary and then accelerates upwards. The correct fixed acceleration of the ring, when the ball reaches the top, is established as 4g/5. The discussion highlights the importance of the ball's initial position within the ring, as it affects the energy dynamics and the resulting calculations. The participant's analysis suggests that if the ball starts at the bottom of the ring, the derived acceleration is 3g/4, indicating a misunderstanding of the energy conservation principles involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically energy conservation laws.
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration (g) and its implications in motion.
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy transformations.
  • Basic algebra for simplifying equations related to motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in non-inertial reference frames.
  • Learn about the effects of acceleration on objects in gravitational fields.
  • Explore the dynamics of oscillatory motion within constrained systems.
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions on motion outcomes in physics problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, educators teaching energy conservation concepts, and anyone interested in solving complex motion problems involving forces and accelerations.

Petrulis
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a ring which radius is R. A little ball moves inside this ring. Ring's plane is perpendicular to the surface of ground. When a ball is moving inside a ring (ring is in quiet), the ball reaches a height which is equal to R/2.
The ring starts to move upright with a fixed acceleration. What is the value of the fixed ring acceleration, if the ball inside the ring reaches the top of the ring?

(I know the answer of this problem (checked at he book) - acceleration is equal to 4g/5 and a ring moves down with this acceleration)


The Attempt at a Solution



What's not clear from the question is where is the ball when the ring acceleration starts. In my opinion, it makes a big difference.

For example, if the ball is at R/2, it has no kinetic energy w/r/t the ring. Since acclereation of the ring creates a relative gravit of g/5, it would still osccilate within the ring at R/2.

If the ball is at the bottom of the ring, then there is kinetic energy when it starts of m*g*R/2. This will get converted to potential energy at a rate of

m*(g-a)*h, or m*g/5*h.​

Since the translational distance within the frame is 2*R, then

m*g*R/2=m*(g-a)*2*R​

Simplify:

g/2=2*g-2*a​

I get:

a= 3*g/4​

What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see anything wrong. I agree with your analysis. The position of the ball certainly makes a difference.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K