Energy Considerations When A Satellite Changes Orbit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the energy required for a satellite to change its orbit from 102 km to 191 km above Earth. The energy needed for this transition is calculated using the formula ΔE = (GM_E * m / 2) * (1/r_i - 1/r_f), resulting in a value of 890 MJ. Additionally, the discussion highlights the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, emphasizing that satellites in higher orbits have lower orbital velocities. The total specific mechanical energy of an orbit is defined as ξ = (v^2 / 2) - (μ_E / r), where μ_E = G * M_E.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and satellite dynamics
  • Knowledge of the gravitational constant (G) and Earth's mass (M_E)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving energy transformations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the total specific mechanical energy formula in orbital mechanics
  • Learn how to calculate tangential velocity for satellites in different orbits
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the implications of orbital altitude on satellite velocity and energy requirements
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, aerospace engineers, and professionals involved in satellite design and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A 1 034-kg satellite orbits the Earth at a constant altitude of 102-km.

(a) How much energy must be added to the system to move the satellite into a circular orbit with altitude 191 km?

(b) What is the change in the system's kinetic energy?

(c) What is the change in the system's potential energy?


Homework Equations


For (a): \Delta E = \frac{GM_Em}{2}(\frac{1}{r_i}-\frac{1}{r_f}


The Attempt at a Solution



I have futilely attempted problem many vexing times; I am beginning to regard this as the bane of my existence.

For (a): r_i = R_E + 102000 and r_f = R_E + 191000, right?

\Delta E = \frac{GM_E \cdot 1034}{2}(\large \frac{1}{R_E + 102000}-\frac{1}{R_E + 191000}) = 890~MJ



For (b) Supposedly there is some relation between gravitational energy and kinetic. I was just going to find the tangential velocity with respect to each orbit, and use those to find the change in kinetic energy. Although, seeing as this direct relationship will provide desired accuracy, what exactly is this relationship?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Relevant Equation deals with the kinetic energy of the system. For part (a) you'll need to account for the change in potential energy, too. What's the expression for gravitational potential energy?

You might want to take note that objects in higher circular orbits have lower orbital velocities; So check the order in which you specify the radius reciprocals in your KE formula.

Hint: An expression for the Total Specific Mechanical Energy of an orbit is:
$$\xi = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu_E}{r}$$
where ##\mu_E = G M_E##

It combines the Kinetic and Potential energy contributions. The result is in J/kg, the energy per kg for the object in orbit. Multiply by the mass of the object in orbit to obtain the total energy in Joules.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K