Energy diagram for hybridized oxygen in CO

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy diagram for hybridized oxygen in carbon monoxide (CO). Participants clarify that oxygen has six electrons, yet the diagram displays only five, leading to confusion. The correct interpretation involves understanding bonding and anti-bonding orbitals, particularly in relation to the molecular orbital (MO) diagram for CO, which is isoelectronic to N2. The exercise aims to illustrate the energy splitting due to hybridization of s and p orbitals, although the necessity of hybridization for diatomic molecules like CO is questioned.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular orbital theory
  • Familiarity with hybridization concepts
  • Knowledge of bonding and anti-bonding orbitals
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics as applied to chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the molecular orbital diagram for CO and its comparison to N2
  • Research the principles of hybridization in diatomic molecules
  • Learn about bonding and anti-bonding interactions in molecular systems
  • Explore the quantum mechanical basis of orbital hybridization
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in molecular orbital theory and hybridization concepts in diatomic molecules.

miyayeah
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please look at the screenshot attached. The answer is "Yes", but I am not sure why.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Oxygen have six electrons, but the energy diagram shows only five. That was why I thought it was wrong, but the diagram shown is correct. Can anyone explain why?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 12.45.49 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 12.45.49 PM.png
    25.7 KB · Views: 732
Physics news on Phys.org
There have to be six electrons. Oxygen isn’t charged in CO. The diagram must be wrong.
 
TeethWhitener said:
The diagram must be wrong.
..., unless, it's for bonding electrons from both carbon and oxygen? Seem to recall some sort of quasi-quantum mechanical argument for "bonding/anti-bonding orbitals."
 
The MO diagram for CO is isoelectronic to N2 and will have either 6 or 10 electrons, depending on whether you choose to include the σ-σ* bonding-antibonding pair generated from the 2s electrons. The point of the exercise is doubtless to highlight the energy splitting due to the hybridization of s and p orbitals on oxygen, but in no world is 5 electrons correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
How the heck do you hybridize a diagram?
Furthermore, there is no reason why O in CO should be hybridized at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener
I agree, it doesn’t make much sense for a diatomic. I imagine the point was to show the effects of hybridization on s and p orbital energies, but that’s probably the least of the problems with this example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K