Energy differences when climbing a flight of stairs

  • Thread starter Thread starter pavadrin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Flight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Climbing a flight of stairs results in an increase in potential energy as one moves away from the center of the Earth. The kinetic energy at the top of the stairs can vary based on the effort exerted while climbing; if one climbs quickly, both potential and kinetic energy increase. Conversely, if the ascent is leisurely, only potential energy increases while kinetic energy remains lower. The relationship between kinetic energy and effort is defined by the equation for kinetic energy, which states that it can be increased or decreased based on the application of external forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the equation for kinetic energy: KE = 1/2 mv²
  • Concept of work-energy principle in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the work-energy theorem and its applications
  • Study the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in Newtonian physics
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of angular momentum on kinetic energy
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, fitness enthusiasts interested in energy expenditure, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of energy transformation during physical activities.

pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth. However would I have more, less or equal amounts of kinetic energy at the top of the flight of stairs, or at the base and why would this be so? If what I had previously stated is also incorrect, could an explanation be provided on what the correct thesis is and why.
Thanks in advance to those who chose to reply,
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pavadrin said:
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth.

Correct. You raised your potential energy by doing work, that is your legs pushed you up the flight of stairs. This energy can be recovered if you were to slide down the stairs on a tray (or whatever else will do without getting you into too much trouble). The work that you did pushing yourself up the stairs were "stored" in the system formed by your body and the earth.

Kinetic energy is not stored. It can be increased or decreased depending on the application of an external force. If the force works in the direction of the motion of the object it will increase its kinetic energy (it will move quicker) and vice versa.

Now coming back to climbing the stairs you need to do additional work, that is your legs need to push extra hard, if you want to go quickly up the stairs - you need to raise your potential energy and increase your kinetic energy.

If you are not in such a hurry your legs only need to push moderately hard in order to raise only your potential energy.

So it is completely up to you by how much your kinetic energy will differ at the top and the bottom of the stairs - it all depends on how eager you are to get up there.
 
pavadrin said:
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth. However would I have more, less or equal amounts of kinetic energy at the top of the flight of stairs, or at the base and why would this be so? If what I had previously stated is also incorrect, could an explanation be provided on what the correct thesis is and why.
Thanks in advance to those who chose to reply,
Pavadrin
Your angular momentum increases when you move farther from the Earth's centre. So your kinetic energy would increase by:

\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\Delta r = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2h

AM
 
thanks for the reply Andrew Mason and andrevdh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K