Energy Loss During Total Internal Reflection

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy loss during total internal reflection, specifically in the context of laser beams reflecting within materials like PMMA and glass. Participants explore the implications of total internal reflection, the role of absorption and scattering, and the applicability of Fresnel equations in practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that total internal reflection implies no intensity loss, while others note that real-world experiments show energy loss due to absorption and scattering.
  • There is a discussion about how reflections contribute to energy loss, with some suggesting that reflections play a significant role in the attenuation observed in materials like PMMA.
  • Participants inquire about formulas to describe energy loss during reflection in materials, with one suggesting the Fresnel equations, while another expresses skepticism about their applicability in total internal reflection scenarios.
  • A participant introduces the concept of frustrated total internal reflection, describing how it can lead to unexpected transmission of light through a material despite predictions of total internal reflection.
  • Some participants express interest in the phenomenon of frustrated total internal reflection and its experimental observations, particularly with microwaves.
  • There is mention of evanescent waves and their relationship to energy loss, with a participant seeking to connect this to transmittance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the extent of energy loss during total internal reflection, with multiple competing views on the role of reflections, absorption, and the applicability of theoretical models like the Fresnel equations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific materials and conditions, as well as the unresolved nature of the mathematical relationships governing energy loss in practical scenarios.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
When a laser beam reflects during total internal reflection, how much of its intensity is lost?

I can't the use Fresnel equations as this is for total internal reflection.If you don't know the answer to the above question, what about the same question, but for mirrors instead?

What are the parameters, and more importantly, how does the intensity lost change with the angle of reflection?
 
Science news on Phys.org
tade said:
When a laser beam reflects during total internal reflection, how much of its intensity is lost?
None. That is what the "total" means
 
Dale said:
None. That is what the "total" means
640px-TIR_in_PMMA.jpg

but in the real world when you conduct experiments with let's say PMMA, the beam does get weaker with every reflection.

I also mentioned mirrors. Internal reflection within a block could lose energy just a like beam reflecting off a mirror loses energy.

And also this:
tade said:
...more importantly, how does the intensity lost change with the angle of reflection?
 
Last edited:
tade said:
but in the real world when you conduct experiments with let's say PMMA, the beam does get weaker with every reflection.

The beam gets weaker by absorption and scattering which hapens not only during the reflections..
 
DrStupid said:
The beam gets weaker by absorption and scattering which hapens not only during the reflections..
true, but from my experience, the reflections do play a major role.

for example, when reflecting in a bar of similar dimensions as shown in the picture above, the increase in path length is not significant enough to produce the attenuation observed, and the beam gets noticeably weaker after each reflection.
 
tade said:
true, but from my experience, the reflections do play a major role.

for example, when reflecting in a bar of similar dimensions as shown in the picture above, the increase in path length is not significant enough to produce the attenuation observed, and the beam gets noticeably weaker after each reflection.
Then to my understanding it isn't total internal reflection.
 
Dale said:
Then to my understanding it isn't total internal reflection.
do you know of any formula that would describe the energy loss for reflection within PMMA or glass etc?
 
tade said:
do you know of any formula that would describe the energy loss for reflection within PMMA or glass etc?
I believe what you are looking for is the Fresnel equations
 
The Fresnel equations that predict total internal reflection will likely never hold perfectly in practice. A good example of where the simple Fresnel formula gets an incomplete/incorrect answer is when you create a case of frustrated total internal reflection by putting a block of the material (usually done with triangular shaped pieces) parallel to and in close proximity of the surface with total internal reflection. As you bring the other block closer and closer, more and more of the beam gets sent through the second block, even though there is an air gap between the two blocks and Fresnel's formulas by themselves would predict total internal reflection. Using the complete Maxwell's equations on this new scenario explains the result completely. In any case, the Fresnel equations that describe total internal reflection, e.g. in a fiber optic cable, are not complete enough to explain reflection losses that will occur.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
  • #10
Charles Link said:
A good example of where the simple Fresnel formula gets an incomplete/incorrect answer is when you create a case of frustrated total internal reflection by putting a block of the material (usually done with triangular shaped pieces) parallel to and in close proximity of the surface with total internal reflection. As you bring the other block closer and closer, more and more of the beam gets sent through the second block, even though there is an air gap between the two blocks and Fresnel's formulas by themselves would predict total internal reflection.

that sounds quite bizarre. do you have any links that describe this phenomenon in more detail?
 
  • #11
tade said:
that sounds quite bizarre. do you have any links that describe this phenomenon in more detail?
It is most readily observed experimentally using microwaves where the blocks can be quite large and easily aligned. With optical wavelengths the experiment is more difficult to do, but the same result is found to occur. The Optics book by Klein discusses it. I think if you google "frustrated total internal reflection" you will get a discussion of it. ## \\ ## Editing... A google of it came up with several postings, and one described it as similar to a quantum mechanical type tunneling. When it is so readily performed with microwaves, I don't know whether it is quite at the level of "quantum mechanical tunneling", but in any case if you google it, you should find some interesting discussion of it. A complete explanation is provided using a classical wave description.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Charles Link said:
It is most readily observed experimentally using microwaves where the blocks can be quite large and easily aligned. With optical wavelengths the experiment is more difficult to do, but the same result is found to occur. The Optics book by Klein discusses it. I think if you google "frustrated total internal reflection" you will get a discussion of it. ## \\ ## Editing... A google of it came up with several postings, and one described it as similar to a quantum mechanical type tunneling. When it is so readily performed with microwaves, I don't know whether it is quite at the level of "quantum mechanical tunneling", but in any case if you google it, you should find some interesting discussion of it. A complete explanation is provided using a classical wave description.
Unfortunately, I can't apply Frustrated TIR as the scenario I have in mind has only one block of dielectric, not two.

Also, interesting that your posts are consistently 100-150 words long each. how come?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Dale said:
I believe what you are looking for is the Fresnel equations

tade said:
I can't the use Fresnel equations as this is for total internal reflection.

If you don't know the answer to the above question, what about the same question, but for silver mirrors instead?
 
  • #15
bump in case someone who knows is around
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K