Energy Loss in Plastic Scintillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy loss for protons, deuterons, and alpha particles as they pass through a 2mm thick plastic scintillator, specifically focusing on energy values ranging from 10 to 200 MeV. The participants reference the Bethe formula and discuss various parameters such as atomic number, atomic weight, and density of the material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of energy loss using the Bethe formula and raise questions about unit conversions, particularly regarding the Z/A ratio and the mass-energy equivalence. There are attempts to clarify the correct interpretation of variables and the implications of unit consistency in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's approaches. Some have identified potential algebraic errors and unit inconsistencies, while others are refining their calculations based on feedback. There is a recognition of the need to integrate energy loss over distance, particularly as the energy loss rate may not be constant.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the need for accurate unit conversions and the potential for varying interpretations of the parameters involved. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the units of the Z/A value and its implications for the calculations.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


Calculate the energy loss loss ##\Delta T## for protons, deuterons and ##\alpha##-particles between ##10## to ##200##MeV when they're passing through a 2mm thick plastic scintillator. Suppose ##Z/A=0.56##, ##I=65eV## and ##\rho = 1.10##g/cm^3.

Homework Equations


Bethe formula
##\frac{dE}{dx}=\left( \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \right)^2 \frac{4 \pi z^2 N_0 Z\rho}{mc^2\beta^2 A} \left[ \ln \left( \frac{ 2mc^2 \beta^2}{I}\right) - \ln (1-\beta^2)-\beta^2\right]##
##N_0## is Avogadro's constant, ##v = \beta c##, ##ze## the electric charge of the particle, ##Z, A## and ##\rho## the atomic number, atomic weight, and density of the stopping material and ##m## the electron mass.

Relativistic energy
##T = mc^2-\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = mc^2-\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}##

Mass of proton ##m_p = 938.28##MeV/c^2
Mass of electron ##m = 0.511003##MeV/c^2
Electron charge ##1.60217662 \cdot 10^{-19}## coulomb
Avogadro's constant ##6.0221409\cdot 10^{23}##
permittivity of free space ##8.85418782\cdot 10^{-12}## F/m

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by just trying to compute ##\Delta T## for ##T = 10 MeV## for the proton.
The ##\beta## factor after some algebra is
##\beta = \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{1}{\frac{T}{mc^2}+1}\right)^2}##

For the rest of the values I converted everything to SI units and then input the formula into matlab. However I end up with an error in the order of ##10^2## if I do this and I think it may be since I'm using the formula with the wrong units. The ##Z/A## value in particular I have no unit of and I don't know if I should convert that to kg or not if it's in atomic mass units.

Here's the MATLAB code for the calculation:
Code:
e=1.60217662e-19; %electron charge
e0 = 8.85418782e-12; %permitivity of free space
ZA = 0.56; %unit??
I=65e-6; %MeV
rho = 1.10*1000; %converted to kg/m^3
N0 = 6.0221409e+23; %avogadro
d=0.002; %distance in meter
z=1; %proton
mc2 = 0.511003; %MeV electron
mc2p = 938.28; %MeV proton
T = 10; %MeV
beta=sqrt(1-1./(T./mc2p+1).^2);
k = (e^2/(4*pi*e0))^2*4*pi*z^2*N0*rho*ZA./(mc2*e*1e6); %convert to joule/meter
temp = 1/beta^2*(log(2*mc2*beta.^2./I)-log(1-beta.^2)-beta.^2);
dT = d*k.*temp/e/10^6 %convert to MeV
This outputs ##0.0105## MeV while the graph provided in the answer says I should get something close to ##9## MeV.

I realize this is quite a long post so I'm mostly hoping that someone is familiar with the formula to know which units I should be using since I suspect that is my error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Incand said:
Z/A value in particular I have no unit of
Isn't it just the ratio protons/(protons+neutrons)?
Incand said:
(mc2*e*1e6)
I must be missing something here. mc2 is 0.5MeV, right? I don't see anything in the quoted equation that corresponds to the e*1e6.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
haruspex said:
Isn't it just the ratio protons/(protons+neutrons)?
I don't think so, it should be the relative atomic mass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula
And unless ##A## got the unit ##kg## the units doesn't work out since
##\left(C^2/(F/m)\right)^2\cdot kg/m^3/J = \frac{C^4 \cdot kg}{F^2\cdot m \cdot J} = \frac{J\cdot kg}{m}##

haruspex said:
I must be missing something here. mc2 is 0.5MeV, right? I don't see anything in the quoted equation that corresponds to the e*1e6.
I converted to joule here. ##1 MeV = e \cdot 10^6##
 
I'm thinking ##A## is the atomic mass in g/mole. The mole here will cancel with the mole in ##N_0## and the grams will cancel with the grams in ##\rho##. But if this is so, then Z/A should have been specified as 0.56 mole/g, rather than as a dimensionless quantity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
I think I may have found an algebraic error. In your expression for ## \beta ## it should be ## T/(mc^2) -1 ## in that denominator instead of ## T/(mc^2)+1 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Charles Link said:
I think I may have found an algebraic error. In your expression for ## \beta ## it should be ## T/(mc^2) -1 ## in that denominator instead of ## T/(mc^2)+1 ##.

I think the expression for ##\beta## is OK. However, the original expression for ##T## was given as
Incand said:
##T = mc^2-\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = mc^2-\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}##
The two terms on the right should be interchanged.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand and Charles Link
Incand, note that the rate of loss of energy, |dE/dx|, increases as the particle slows down. So, you might not be able to treat dE/dx as a constant while the particle is traveling the 2 mm distance through the plastic.

EDIT: Is there any way you could post the graph you referred to in the OP?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
mole/g would make sense, I see if I can get some better values out of that.

I redrew the answer figure. It's not exact but pretty close. It is a loglog plot. I get lines similar lines if I do the same calculation as above but varying beta but with the wrong factors infront.

That's true TSny, I guess I may have to integrate then. Still at least for high energy particle the energy loss is low enough that this shouldn't affect the answer that much so maybe it's easier to work on the 200 MeV side first.
 

Attachments

Okey It seems you were correct about the unit of ##Z/A##. Using that I get reasonable answers

Code:
e=1.60217662e-19; %electron charge
e0 = 8.85418782e-12; %permitivity of free space
ZA = 0.56; %unit??
I=65e-6; %MeV
rho = 1.10*10^6; %converted to g/m^3
N0 = 6.0221409e+23; %avogadro
d=0.002; %distance in meter
z=1; %proton
mc2 = 0.511003; %MeV electron
mc2p = 938.28; %MeV proton
T = 200; %MeV
beta=sqrt(1-1./(T./mc2p+1).^2);
k = (e^2/(4*pi*e0))^2*4*N0*pi*z^2*rho*ZA./(mc2*e*1e6); %convert to joule/meter
temp = 1/beta^2*(log(2*mc2*beta.^2./I)-log(1-beta.^2)-beta.^2);
dT = d*k.*temp/e/10^6 %convert to MeV
This outputs about ##1##MeV. while if I change to ##T=10##MeV I get ##\Delta T \approx 11## MeV so I'm in the right order. I'm guessing it's just I need to integrate to get the last part. For ##200## MeV, it already works well
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K