Energy-Momentum Tensor: How Much Do University Students Learn?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the depth of knowledge university physics students acquire regarding the energy-momentum tensor compared to what is presented in textbooks. It explores whether students engage in more comprehensive discussions and problem-solving related to the tensor in their courses, particularly in the context of electromagnetism and special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if university physics courses provide a deeper understanding of the energy-momentum tensor than what is typically found in textbooks, citing their own experience in linear algebra as a contrast.
  • Another participant requests clarification on what constitutes "more than what's in the textbooks," seeking specific examples from the original poster's linear algebra course.
  • A participant describes the challenging nature of problems encountered in their linear algebra course, emphasizing the need to memorize properties of determinants and matrix operations, which they feel are underrepresented in textbooks.
  • It is suggested that the depth of learning about the energy-momentum tensor may depend on the professor's approach to teaching electromagnetism, with some focusing on conventional methods and only briefly mentioning covariant formalism.
  • Concerns are raised that students often learn about energy density, the Poynting vector, and Maxwell stresses without understanding their relation to the energy-momentum tensor.
  • One participant notes that electromagnetism textbooks often contain more material than can be adequately covered in a single semester, potentially limiting students' exposure to the energy-momentum tensor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent of knowledge gained about the energy-momentum tensor in university courses, with no consensus reached on whether students learn significantly more than what is presented in textbooks.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability in teaching approaches among professors and the potential for textbooks to omit certain advanced topics or problem-solving techniques that may be emphasized in lectures.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
There are plentty of textbooks and online papers that talk about the energy momentum tensor, but they all look to me as if they're only covering the very introductory aspects of it. To put another way, it seems that there's much more to be learn.

I would like to know if university physics students are taught a lot more about the energy momentum tensor than one can find in the textbooks? I mean, I would want to know whether they have detailed disscusions about it in a physics course in the uni.

I am myself an undergrad physics student, but we have not even had special relativity classes as of yet.

From my own experience, for example in introductory linear algebra (aka matrices) we are required to know more than what's covered in textbooks, because our exams are very hard, and we won't pass them otherwise. Therefore we end up with a much more deeper knowledge compared to someone who taught himself this only by reading textbooks.

Does the same thing happens regarding the EM tensor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to understand what you mean by more than what's in the textbooks, can you give examples from your linear algebra course of things you learned in lectures that cannot be found in the textbooks?
 
You are given some very difficult problems involving matrices or vector spaces to solve. You need to memorize things such as properties of determinants and operations with matrices.

Textbooks don't treat these very much.
 
These exercises are an integral part of the material to be learnt. It's as important for a physicist to learn both the concepts and then do tons of problems to be able to solve concrete problems.

It depends a bit on the professor who teaches electromagnetism. Many teach it in the conventional non-relativistic way and mention the covariant formalism only at the very end. That's why usually one learns about the energy density, the Poynting vector, and Maxwell stresses without ever being told that all together are just components of the energy-momentum tensor of the em. field. Also usually in em. textbooks is more material than can be covered in a one-semester lecture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K