Energy needed to stop the Earth's inner core ---and its effects?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xpell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Effects Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the energy required to stop the Earth's inner core rotation relative to the mantle and the potential effects of such a scenario. Participants explore the implications of recent claims about the inner core's rotation and the associated energy calculations, touching on concepts from physics and geophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the feasibility of stopping the inner core, suggesting it would require immense energy that could lead to catastrophic consequences.
  • Another participant proposes calculating the angular kinetic energy of the inner core and the energy difference needed to synchronize its rotation with the Earth's crust.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that stopping the inner core would require external energy, suggesting that reducing the difference in rotation speed could release energy instead.
  • A participant clarifies that the recent claims about the inner core's rotation pausing likely refer to it rotating at the same angular velocity as the mantle, rather than stopping entirely.
  • There is mention of the inner core's relative rotation rate being approximately 0.5 degrees per year, leading to a long period of rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the implications of stopping the inner core's rotation or the energy dynamics involved. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the inner core's rotation and the energy calculations necessary to address the initial question.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of calculating the energy involved, including the need for assumptions about the inner core's current rotation rate relative to the mantle and the definitions of energy release in this context.

xpell
Messages
139
Reaction score
16
This is not for any kind of homework ---the last time that I went to school was 30+ years ago. However, I am a curious person, I've been asked by other people who know that I love science and I need to calculate this:

As you will most possibly know, a misreading of this paper by the media caused kind of a "panic" about how the Earth's inner core had stopped or even reversed its rotation and its "apocalyptic" effects, etc. When asked, I immediately knew that it wasn't possible ---by energetic reasons, to start with. I more-or-less thought that stopping the core relative to the mantle would need immense amounts of energy "appeared out of the blue" whose application would be truly apocalyptic ---basically, destroying the Earth. Which was and is obviously impossible.

Well, now I've been challenged to "prove it" by the usual you-know-whos and I'd like to calculate how much energy would be actually needed to stop the inner core rotation relative to the mantle, and its effects on the Earth. However, as I said, last time I went to school was 30+ years ago... and that was high school. I initially thought that a simple calculation of the rotational kinetic energy needed to deccelerate the inner core to 0 would be enough, but I'm now realizing that it's possibly more complex than that ---and I'd still wouldn't know how to translate the results into "Earth destruction units".

So... please, is anybody here kind enough to help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Earth's surface crust rotates relative to the stars, once each sidereal day, which is about 23 hours 56 minutes and 4 seconds. Everything inside the Earth rotates at very close to the Earth's crust rotation rate.

Because the Earth's outer core is liquid, the solid inner core can rotate very slightly faster or slower than the crust. That can be measured by changes in the phase of earthquake waves that travel through the inner core, both ways around the Earth.

To calculate the energy needed to stop that relative rotation, we need to know how much faster or slower the inner core is now rotating relative to the crust. If the relative rate has changed recently, then the relative rate will now be very low.

Work out the angular kinetic energy of the inner core rotation, using the moment of inertia of a solid sphere, assuming it was rotating exactly once each sidereal day. Then work out the actual energy of the inner core at the rate it is now rotating. The difference between those, is the energy needed to slow down, or to speed up, the inner core to the same rate as the Earth's crust.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, PeroK and topsquark
xpell said:
I more-or-less thought that stopping the core relative to the mantle would need immense amounts of energy
This seems to be a misconception. Reducing the difference in rotation speed between inner core and mantle can release energy. The total kinetic energy of those two can be lowered by syncing their rotation. This released energy can go into heat or kinetic energy of the liquid outer core.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
The trouble lies with this phrase.

inner-core rotation has recently paused

If it had really gone to zero relative to the Sun that would indeed be cataclysmic. But it's clear that they mean that the core and mantle have in the past decade been rotating at the same angular velocity. Usually there is some small difference. In the past decade, not.

You can get the average density of the core, the average radius of the core, and estimate the angular momentum. Then translate that into trillions of Megatons or something like that. But I would guess that nevertheless your friends will keep on believing whatever they feel like believing, which will be whatever most of their friends believe. If you persist in deviation maybe they will no longer consider you a friend. So in situations like this I usually nod sagely and keep my mouth shut.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Hornbein said:
If it had really gone to zero relative to the Sun that would indeed be cataclysmic.
This might be the misconception of the people "panicking" about it. But @xpell seems to have the misconception that stopping the relative rotation between inner core and mantle would require external energy input.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Hornbein
Any differential velocity represents a potential source of energy.

The inner core rotation rate, relative to the crust, is of the order of 0.5 degree per year.
Therefore, the period of rotation is; T ≈ 720 years.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
850
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K