andymars
- 14
- 2
Yep. You should solve using energy. My last post described how I would do it. You can answer haruspex's questions to get the same result.
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses connected by a spring on an incline. The original poster describes a scenario where a 25 kg mass is pulled down a distance of 20 cm, affecting a 30 kg mass attached to a spring. The problem involves analyzing forces and energy conservation to determine the velocities of both masses when the spring returns to its unstretched state.
Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the spring and the connection between the masses. Some suggest using energy conservation to find velocities, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the forces involved. There is no explicit consensus on the approach or the correct interpretation of the problem.
Key information such as the initial heights of the masses and the length of the incline is not specified, leading to challenges in applying energy conservation fully. Participants are considering how to account for the potential energy changes in both masses and the spring.
Panphobia said:Yea I know I messed up I thought 20 was the height for a second. Messed up but it is mg20 sin40
Panphobia said:ohhhhhhhhhhhh myyyyy, I didn't think of doing that, just adding the energies of m1 and m2. Now I get it so m1g(20+h-20sin40°) + m2g(40) + (1/2)k(20)2 = (1/2)m1v^2 + (1/2)m2v^2 + m2g20 + m1g(20 + h), then the m1g distributes and cancels with the mgh on the other side, and now it is solvable. Is that right?