andymars
- 14
- 2
Yep. You should solve using energy. My last post described how I would do it. You can answer haruspex's questions to get the same result.
Panphobia said:Yea I know I messed up I thought 20 was the height for a second. Messed up but it is mg20 sin40
Panphobia said:ohhhhhhhhhhhh myyyyy, I didn't think of doing that, just adding the energies of m1 and m2. Now I get it so m1g(20+h-20sin40°) + m2g(40) + (1/2)k(20)2 = (1/2)m1v^2 + (1/2)m2v^2 + m2g20 + m1g(20 + h), then the m1g distributes and cancels with the mgh on the other side, and now it is solvable. Is that right?