Engaging Textbooks: Making Learning Interesting for Kids

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the need for engaging textbooks that align with children's interests, particularly in subjects like physics. Participants emphasize the importance of incorporating relatable themes, such as superheroes like Batman and Spider-Man, to make learning more appealing. The conversation highlights the tension between tailoring educational content to student interests and adhering to standardized curricula. Additionally, the lack of formal training in the science of learning for educators contributes to ineffective teaching practices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of educational pedagogy
  • Familiarity with the science of learning
  • Knowledge of standardized curriculum requirements
  • Awareness of engaging teaching materials and resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective methods for integrating student interests into physics education
  • Explore the science of learning and its application in teacher training
  • Investigate engaging educational resources, such as "Physics of the Superheroes" by James Kakalios
  • Examine case studies on the impact of relatable content in textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Educators, curriculum developers, and anyone involved in teaching science to children, particularly those looking to enhance engagement and relevance in physics education.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,861
What a great teaching opportunity! Why aren't more textbooks gears towards kids actual interests. Most problems are so dry. Include batman or Spider-Man and kids may actually be interested!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 680
Science news on Phys.org
Haha, true say!
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
What a great teaching opportunity! Why aren't more textbooks gears towards kids actual interests. Most problems are so dry. Include batman or Spider-Man and kids may actually be interested!

Kidding aside, this issue consistently generates huge amounts of discussion- presenting introductory physics to biology students is but one example- http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/66/7/10.1063/PT.3.2046

There are many books out there as well, for example https://www.amazon.com/dp/1592405088/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Reasonable people can disagree about how to incorporate 'actual interests' (and what that even means) into the introductory physics curriculum. On one hand, we are supposed to tailor the material to each student's abilities and interests; on the other, we have to teach a standardized content.

A good example is the cell phone- everyone has one, but how to discuss it within the framework of an introductory physics class? Either the reality of the device is discussed, which is too complex, or the abstracted principles are discussed, which removes the relevance.

Finally, until the 'science of learning' is formally incorporated into professional training, we will continue to generate 'faith-based' teachers who develop a teaching practice according to what they think is most effective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Last edited by a moderator:
I have mixed feelings about this sort of thing. For some people, it makes physics interesting. For other people, it just seems to reinforce the idea that physics isn't useful in "real life." (As in, why should I care about physics if it only let's me solve contrived situations in a made-up world?)
 
Nice idea of actually creating interest in kids.
 

Similar threads

Replies
97
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
16K