Engineering physics degree vs physics degree

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences between a bachelor's degree in engineering physics and a bachelor's degree in physics, particularly regarding graduate program options and employability. Participants explore the nature of each degree, their curricula, and the potential career paths associated with them.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that engineering physics combines applied physics with theoretical concepts, while traditional physics programs may focus more heavily on theory.
  • One participant notes that their engineering physics program allows for a customizable curriculum, enabling students to choose between a physics-heavy path or a more engineering-focused one.
  • Another participant reflects on their experience in a previous engineering physics program, highlighting the rigorous workload and the perception that graduates from such programs are highly capable and hardworking.
  • Concerns are raised about the variability of engineering physics programs across institutions, suggesting that prospective students should investigate specific program details.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the structure and focus of engineering physics versus physics degrees, with no consensus on which degree offers better employability or graduate school opportunities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall advantages of each degree type.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the curriculum and focus of engineering physics programs can vary significantly by institution, which may affect the perceived value and outcomes of the degree.

StatGuy2000
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,073
Reaction score
1,155
This is a topic that I would like to pose to Physics Forums.

I have always wondered about the differences between a bachelor's degree in engineering physics and a corresponding bachelor's degree in physics.

Specifically, what I would like to know if whether studying engineering physics provide more options for those students to pursue a wider variety of graduate programs than a regular physics degree, and also the "employability" of an engineering physics BS degree.

(For the record, I knew only a couple of people with a background in engineering physics; one finished his PhD in computer science and the other finished her PhD in statistics).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Engineering physics is a hybrid discipline that is more or less applied physics mixed with theory. Physics programs are often weighted to theory, and engineering programs are weighted toward applications. However, the portion of theory may vary according to departments and universities.

Most often, I see Engineering Physics affiliated with Engineering departments.

There is a need for both theory and applications.
 
At my school ep is through the college of engineering but most of my classes are physics classes and my advisor is the physics advisor.

It is also highly customizable, I could take the same physics curriculum that physics majors headed for grad school take, or I could take a lesser amount of physics (one semester of quantum and e&m, stat phys not required), and more engineering.

As far as engineering goes, I can choose from eight concentrations: aero, cs, ee, mech, nuclear, industrial, chemical, and materials. I am taking cs so I'm required to take a year of software engineering with components, data structures and algorithms I, numerical methods, assembly and C, and about ten hours more electives.

I also take a year-long senior research lab course for ep majors, and a one-semester senior survey lab for ep majors.

In short, it can prepare you equally well for industry or grad school depending on your chosen classes.
 
At my alma mater, engineering physics is no longer offered. When it was, one took the entire curriculum for mechanical engineering, and the the entire curriculum for physics, minus the overlap. If this sounds like a lot of work, it was. I did not do this, I took a B.S. in Physics. In retrospect, I probably would have really enjoyed it, because my work is mostly mechanical engineering. I also learned everything I needed later.

The program was not popular, due to the intense workload required. Only very smart and very hard working students could reasonably complete it, which selected for only the best and brightest. *If* you graduated in this program from my school, it was a strong signal for "smart, works hard, manages time well".

Engineering physics programs seem to vary widely. Check into the details of your program.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
27K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K