Engineering Physics vs. Honors Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process between pursuing an engineering physics program versus an honors physics program at a university. Participants explore the implications of each choice in terms of curriculum, career paths, and preparation for becoming an experimental physicist.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights that the engineering physics program requires more credits but offers additional engineering knowledge, potentially leading to a P.Eng qualification.
  • Another participant notes that the honors physics program includes a thesis that could enhance graduate school applications through potential publications.
  • Some participants suggest that the choice depends on whether one values the broader engineering knowledge for practical applications or prefers a more traditional physics education focused on theoretical aspects.
  • A participant from Sweden shares their experience in a similar program, indicating that a background in engineering can be beneficial for constructing experimental setups, but emphasizes that physicists can learn necessary skills as needed.
  • Concerns are raised that the engineering physics program may lean more towards engineering preparation rather than physics, suggesting that the honors program might be more suitable for those specifically aiming to become experimental physicists.
  • One participant mentions that some physicists have successfully transitioned into experimental work with minimal prior exposure, indicating flexibility in career paths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of the engineering physics program versus the honors physics program for aspiring experimental physicists. There is no consensus on which path is definitively better, as opinions vary based on personal experiences and career aspirations.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of additional coursework and the potential for career flexibility, but there are unresolved questions about how each program specifically prepares students for experimental physics roles.

Would you recommend engineering physics or honors physics?

  • Do Engineering Physics

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • Do Honors Physics

    Votes: 8 57.1%

  • Total voters
    14
Voraldo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,I am trying to decide between the engineering physics program and the honors physics program at my university. The engineering physics program at my university is fairly similar to this one: http://www.engphys.ubc.ca/courses.html . The honors physics program is fairly standard. My ultimate goal is to become an experimental physicist in a yet to be determined field. I am indifferent to working in industry or academia.

Engineering physics requires ~45 more credits to graduate but gives me enough electrical engineering knowledge to get a P.Eng in electrical engineering if I so choose.

The honours physics program includes an honours thesis in the final year which could lead to a publication which would be beneficial for grad school.

What do all of you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help out. :)
 
It is all about if you want to spend another year to get the extra options given by eng phys? It contains everything you could expect from a physics bachelor so it won't hold you back in that department.
 
I may be a bit partial, as I'm taking a 5 years engineering physics program in Sweden, including both a 3 years bachelor and a 2 years masters degree. We definitely get a fair bit of both subjects in the first three years - and I'm going to use the masters to go more into theoretical physics, including some PhD courses, so the level is not a problem either.

The UBC courses do seem similar (in names) to ones we have. I'd say that perhaps there is an advantage to knowing some engineering if you want to construct experimental setups, but then again it's hardly impossible for a physicist to learn circuit analysis when the time comes. However, this way you get a little broader engineering knowledge, which would also help you in industry jobs if you don't end up as an experimentalist.
 
To me it seems that the UBC Engineering Physics course is really meant to prepare you more of an engineer than a physicst.

In Europe, Engineering Physics is the revised name for "Technical Physics".
In Technical Physics you study more or less the same physics courses as the other majors but you have to do some applied science lectures (e.g. mechanical engineering).There is one issue here, you can be an experimentalist either way, but if you want to be an experimental physicist I think the Physics honors degree would be more suitable.

You never know, say you don't like the whole applied thing later and found your calling in theoretical physics.

I talked to a few physicsts who started doing research in fields that are new them (experimental), they just learned the very basic during the bachelor, and for their experiments had to learn new things naturally.
 
Thanks for your advice everyone, I've already made my decision now so please stop replying to this thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
4K