Engineering Science at U of Toronto

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Engineering Science program at the University of Toronto, focusing on its difficulty, competitiveness, and suitability for students interested in pursuing graduate studies in engineering or physics. Participants share their experiences and opinions regarding the program's structure, grading, and the implications for future academic and career opportunities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the Engineering Science program is a good fit for students interested in both physics and aerospace engineering, potentially preparing them for graduate school.
  • Others warn that the program is very difficult, time-consuming, and competitive, with class averages typically lower than other engineering programs at U of T.
  • Several participants note that the program is demanding, with expectations of 30+ hours of class per week and significant homework and project commitments.
  • There is a discussion about the grading system, with some indicating that grades are relative to peers, making it challenging to achieve high marks due to the competitive nature of the cohort.
  • One participant mentions that the difficulty of the program may depend on the competitiveness of peers rather than the curriculum itself.
  • Concerns are raised about the trade-off between choosing a more challenging program with a potentially lower GPA versus an easier program with a higher GPA, particularly regarding graduate school admissions.
  • Some participants recommend considering other engineering programs at U of T that may allow for a mix of aerospace courses without the intensity of the Engineering Science path.
  • There are mixed opinions on the value of GPA versus program rigor when applying for graduate studies or entering the workforce.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the Engineering Science program is challenging and competitive, but there are differing views on its suitability for graduate school preparation and the implications of GPA versus program difficulty. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for prospective students.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the grading systems and peer competitiveness across different universities and programs, indicating that experiences may differ significantly based on individual circumstances and institutional contexts.

  • #31
Hey, congrats to those who received admission offers.
I am a EngSci (Nano Option) who's about to graduate (unless I failed my last exams…j/k:smile:). I can tell you that many things people mentioned about the Engineering Science program are quite true. Allow me to add a few more comments and elaborate on a few things here.

You get to choose your specialization later after 2nd year - this would be a great thing if you have lots of interests in all sorts of areas and you don't want to choose your major yet. You will be taking courses from various areas where many of them are taught by professors who are active in their own fields – they try to teach you to have the solid fundamentals and appreciation for all these subjects. By the end of your 2nd yr, you will have better feel which areas you really like and you are good at (+highly interdisciplinary background). However, if you know what major you want now and it's especially something traditional (Elec, CS, Civ, Mech, Chem, pure physics (not applied/engineering), etc.), Engineering Science may not be best suited for you. The curriculum is not so focused and it's hard to learn in depth in any of the areas till after 2nd year. And you may need some time to catch up later on to reach the same kind of level as students of other programs of the same year. This may be immediately apparent in 3rd yr as you share your 3rd yr classes with non-EngSci students. Even if you are interested one of the "unique" options (Biomed, Aero, Nano etc.), it's similar story. For example, if you choose Aero, some of the things learned in 1st and 2nd yr such as quantum mechanics and biomedical engineering wouldn't be so useful, and time would have been better spent by taking more relevant courses. Make sure you know what you will be learning by checking out their curriculum – it slightly changes from year to year.

Let me elaborate on the difficulty of the program. Chance is that you will enter the program with your high school grades in 90s. In your 1st year, your average will likely drop to 70s - that's even after bell curving and this kind of average will continue in 2nd yr and so on. Now, this sounds tough. But by constantly challenging yourself and pushing the boundaries in order to survive, you should be able earn tremendous amount of soft skills such as time-management, team work (from study groups/group projects), how to work under pressure and motivate yourself, etc. Expect a few all nighters and shower-less days and trashing your design project that never worked. But finding out (early) that doing an assignment can actually take you longer than 10 mins is something worthwhile.

About the reputation of the program, in Canada, it's very well recognized as one of the top engineering programs. It should be definitely advantageous when you apply for jobs (including summer research jobs) and grad schools in Canada. However, outside Canada, it is not always well known and you can't always rely on its reputation. Still, University of Toronto itself does have its worldwide reputation and Canadian universities in general seem to be known for more rigorous undergraduate education than most of US schools. But then, my feeling is that the reputation of place where you got undergraduate degree from wouldn’t matter much as you advance further in your career. (Industry will value your work experience most and academia will value your postgraduate works more)

In terms of student demographics (not exactly sure why people are interested in this), it is as diverse as the city of Toronto itself. I think many of them are Canadian citizen or permanent resident though. The largest number of undergrad international students at UofT (not engineering) is from US, followed by China.

Places dedicated for EngScis - well we do have a nice conference room (for study and student group meetings) and computer room that are recently renovated and located at a place near most of enigeering classrooms.

My piece of advice is that wherever you decide to go, make best out of the learning opportunities and prepare yourself well for the next level. What you learn in university will go long way in your life than your grades. You can’t just seat back and expect your “prestigious” program will provide all the top-quality education and get you the jobs for you. Be actively engaged in your education – ask questions, read outside lectures, form study groups etc. (also, remember how much tuition you are paying) And think ahead and plan early for your summer break (4 mth of summer can get really boring) and life after graduation.

I know a friend (was in physics option) who didn't enjoy the EngSci program much and switched to art&science physics program at the end of 3rd year(!). But he knew what he was doing and ended up very fine – he is going to work with a Nobel laureate in experimental physics at a top physics grad school next year. So I guess a lot depend on you.

UTENG said:
Just curious, is there any reason in particular that that Aerospace option is not very popular, or is it just of lesser interest to the majority of people than the other options?

Aerospace is actually a popular option in EngSci program compared to physics, nano, manu, and infra. Many of my aero friends seem to be doing okay and happy with the program so I can’t express much concern about the program. One annoying thing may be the Aerospace department (UTIAS) is near Downsview airport (~30 min) away from downtown campus so you may have to travel there often while working on your 4th year thesis project. In terms of job prospect, I think there are less jobs available in aero compared to Biomeds, and Elec. I heard Biomed got very good prospects in terms of opportunity and money and many people enter EngSci to specialize in that option.

Oh, forgot to mention one important thing – if you don’t like any of the options you can create your own option and take any of Engineering/Art&Science courses in your upper years as long as you know what you’re doing and it meets the accreditation criteria set by the professional engineering board. Within your option you can also take courses that are not part of your upper year curriculum if you are able to get an approval from the option chair which is usually easy (and meet the accreditation criteria, of course).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hi, I want to be a theoretical physicist. I'm planning to go to grad school for theoretical physics. Which do you think is better for me, to take EngSci or Physics?

Should I/How could I double major in EngSci and Physics?

There's a special program (course) in UofT that 1st physics majors can do research, can I still take that if I'm in EngSci?
 
  • #33
Bright Wang said:
Should I/How could I double major in EngSci and Physics?

Seems quite infeasible, as the EngSci course load will already take up all your time. You can count how much physics you can take through the EngSci physics option relative to a physics specialist.

There's a special program (course) in UofT that 1st physics majors can do research, can I still take that if I'm in EngSci?

I don't know, cf. http://engsci.utoronto.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66&Itemid=99
 
  • #34
  • #35
These were the PHY courses offered in Summer 2008: http://www.artsandscience.utoronto.ca/ofr/timetable/summer/phy.htm

I'm in math not physics, so I don't know whether it is indicative of other years that no upper-year physics courses are offered in summer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
mutton said:
These were the PHY courses offered in Summer 2008: http://www.artsandscience.utoronto.ca/ofr/timetable/summer/phy.htm

I'm in math not physics, so I don't know whether it is indicative of other years that no upper-year physics courses are offered in summer.

I'm not even sure, what's taught in 1st year physics. Can you send me a link?

I know http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/undergraduate/courses/first-year but that doesn't help very much.

Also EngSci has to much Bio and non-physics or math subject, why would it prepare me better than just taking physics major?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K