Engineering science B.S. -> physics phD?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the transition from a B.S. in engineering science to pursuing a PhD in physics. Participants explore concerns regarding the adequacy of the participant's physics background, the necessity of the physics GRE, and strategies for addressing perceived gaps in knowledge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that graduate schools often accept students with non-traditional backgrounds, including engineering, but may require them to take undergraduate courses to catch up.
  • There is uncertainty about the necessity of the physics GRE, with some indicating that certain programs do not require it, while others emphasize that most do.
  • Concerns are raised about the participant's lack of coursework in quantum mechanics (QM) and statistical mechanics, which some believe could hinder success in graduate-level physics.
  • One participant mentions that applied physics programs might be more accommodating to engineering backgrounds compared to traditional physics programs.
  • There is a discussion about the potential challenges of transitioning from engineering to physics, with some participants noting that engineering students often struggle in physics graduate programs.
  • Some participants recommend self-teaching or taking additional courses to strengthen the participant's physics foundation before applying to graduate school.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and caution regarding the participant's aspirations. While some agree that it is possible to transition into physics from engineering, others highlight significant challenges and gaps in the participant's physics education that may need to be addressed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is influenced by individual experiences with graduate programs, and there is variability in the requirements and expectations across different institutions. Specific assumptions about the participant's preparedness and the nature of graduate coursework are not universally agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a transition from engineering to physics graduate programs, as well as those interested in the requirements and challenges of pursuing advanced studies in physics.

ekrim
Messages
177
Reaction score
2
Engineering science B.S. --> physics phD?

Hello PF,

I will graduate next spring with a B.S. in engineering science, and will be applying this fall for graduate school. I have found physics much more fulfilling than engineering and would like to enter a physics phD problem. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if I've had the background to take the physics GRE. By graduation I will have taken:

Intro sequence, E&M I/II, Modern Physics, P.Chem, Calc sequence, diff eq, PDE, complex analysis, and linear algebra

Is the physics GRE required, and would they even accept me with my course deficit (even a top tier school)? Could I take the missing courses at a state school, and apply later, and what am I missing besides CM and QM? I have a high GPA and a few research projects, if that helps.

Sorry for the barrage of questions. Feel free to answer any of them or to scold me for insolence.

-ekrim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you get accepted to a grad school, they will probably stick you in undergrad classes for awhile. Grad schools accept students that don't have an excellent background all the time though, so go for it!
 
DavidWhitbeck said:
If you get accepted to a grad school, they will probabaly stick you in undergrad classes for awhile. Grad schools accept students that don't have an excellent background all the time though, so go for it!

These students suffer in grad school all the time too. I am not trying to discourage you to go to grad school. But you should pick up an E&M book by jackson to see how grad school is like. If those maths tricks confuses you, you should start some self-teaching
 
Thanks for the replies guys. I'm really just concerned about getting in, I don't mind being behind. I was thinking of applying for physics at a few places, and for materials science at others in case physics doesn't want me. But if not having a GRE is a death sentence, I'll have to find another way (more courses/masters/selling soul/etc)
 
ekrim said:
Hello PF,

I will graduate next spring with a B.S. in engineering science, and will be applying this fall for graduate school. I have found physics much more fulfilling than engineering and would like to enter a physics phD problem. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if I've had the background to take the physics GRE. By graduation I will have taken:

Intro sequence, E&M I/II, Modern Physics, P.Chem, Calc sequence, diff eq, PDE, complex analysis, and linear algebra

Is the physics GRE required, and would they even accept me with my course deficit (even a top tier school)? Could I take the missing courses at a state school, and apply later, and what am I missing besides CM and QM? I have a high GPA and a few research projects, if that helps.

Sorry for the barrage of questions. Feel free to answer any of them or to scold me for insolence.

-ekrim

Try reading this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

Zz.
 
My grad school admits a few engineers into the physics PhD program every year. I have yet to see one complete it - most don't make it past the first year. And my school is a pretty easy program. A few grad schools don't require the physics GRE, but most do. If you do manage to get into one, be prepared to catch up. The grad level courses assume a knowledge of undergrad physics, so you'll have to take a few undergrad courses your first year. You won't be the only grad student taking them - I took a few as well, coming from a liberal arts school (no QM II or E&M II).

A lot of applied physics programs don't require the physics GRE for admission, even at top schools, so you can look into that too.

Good luck - once you make it past the coursework and quals, the rest is easy! (says the girl who still has yet to do her topic defense)
 
leon1127 said:
These students suffer in grad school all the time too. I am not trying to discourage you to go to grad school. But you should pick up an E&M book by jackson to see how grad school is like. If those maths tricks confuses you, you should start some self-teaching

Well Jackson is not a good example of what grad is like, except for in the sense of hazing and useless work (*cough* edit: of course there is a lot of useful work, but there is drudgery just as there is with any job). Most of the textbooks I had in grad school were actually insightful, well written and not obsessed with applied math gymnastics. Besides the OP already took a ton of applied math and should be ready for Jackson.

No, I think that the problem with the engineering science background is not the math. The problem is not taking enough physics. He has had no qm, no stat mech, no serious upper level modern physics electives. Pchem is better than nothing, but I have a feeling that it's qm and sm that will kick his butt. The problem will surface as soon as he hears something like "it's just a Bose-Einstein condensate..." and he's like "what in the who now?"
 
Last edited:
DavidWhitbeck said:
Well Jackson is not a good example of what grad is like, except for in the sense of hazing and useless work (*cough* edit: of course there is a lot of useful work, but there is drudgery just as there is with any job). Most of the textbooks I had in grad school were actually insightful, well written and not obsessed with applied math gymnastics. Besides the OP already took a ton of applied math and should be ready for Jackson.

No, I think that the problem with the engineering science background is not the math. The problem is not taking enough physics. He has had no qm, no stat mech, no serious upper level modern physics electives. Pchem is better than nothing, but I have a feeling that it's qm and sm that will kick his butt. The problem will surface as soon as he hears something like "it's just a Bose-Einstein condensate..." and he's like "what in the who now?"

that sounds about right.

Thanks everyone for the replies. It seems as though I won't be able to march in and take physics by storm. Can anyone say anything about taking non-degree seeking courses after graduation vs. a non-thesis masters at an inexpensive university, if I was trying to level the playing field?
 
Have you tried applying for Applied Physics programs? I think they're more engineering-oriented than regular physics programs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K