Engineering undergrad -> astrophysics PhD

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the pathway from an engineering undergraduate degree to pursuing a PhD in astrophysics. Participants explore the suitability of civil engineering versus informatics engineering as preparatory degrees for a graduate career in astrophysics, considering the necessary background in physics and mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a long-term goal of pursuing a PhD in astrophysics but lacks an undergraduate degree in the field, seeking advice on which engineering program might be more beneficial.
  • Another participant suggests selecting a graduate school based on its requirements and evaluating personal preparedness for the program.
  • A participant with a background in music highlights concerns about being unqualified for astrophysics graduate programs without a science or engineering degree, and seeks clarity on which engineering discipline would be more advantageous given their interest in computational fluid dynamics.
  • One participant argues that an engineering degree may leave the individual unprepared for the mathematical rigor of an astrophysics PhD, based on their experience working with astrophysicists.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of an engineering degree for preparation for a PhD in astrophysics, with some emphasizing the importance of mathematical rigor while others focus on the relevance of specific engineering disciplines.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the curriculum and requirements of graduate programs in astrophysics, as well as the potential gaps in knowledge due to the lack of a traditional science background.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a transition from engineering to astrophysics, especially those with non-traditional academic backgrounds or interests in computational methods in astrophysics.

Segala
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi people!

My long-time goal is to pursue a PhD in astrophysics. Since an undergraduate in astrophysics is not available to me, I'm looking for alternatives. There are two cool engineering programs at hand: one in civil engineering, the other one in informatics engineering. Both are interesting but I wonder what is a better option as far as a graduate career in astrophysics is concerned.

What do you think? Any personal experience? Thanks for any advice!
Seg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Pick a school where you want to do your graduate school in astrophysics.

2. Look at the courses/syllabus, and what they require.

3. Do you think you are equipped to understand and do well in such a program?

Also, read this:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

Zz.
 
Dear ZapperZ,
thanks for your advice. But I want to rephrase my post.

Because I have an undergrad in music, no physics/astrophysics graduate department is open to receive my application. I'm quite confident in my background, to include maths, physics and astrophysics. However, I'm convinced that, without an undergrad in science/engineering I will not get any far.

There are, however, only two options available to me at this moment: civil or informatics engineering. So, my question is actually about what degree will be more useful (specially because I'm quite ignorant about engineering). The civil eng. curriculum has a heavy mechanics component, to include fluid mechanics and dynamics. On the other hand, the informatic curriculum lies on programming. Since my ultimate goal is somewhere in the field of computational fluid dynamics applied to astrophysics, I'm really confused.

Any thoughts?
Seg.
 
My thoughts is you will be woefully unprepared for an astrophysics Ph.D. with a BS in engineering. The mathematical rigor will eat you alive. I say this as an engineer who sometimes works with astrophysicists.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K