Calculating Enthalpy ΔH of H2O at 101 kPa: Detailed Process & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter krootox217
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    enthalpy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The enthalpy change (ΔH) of 1 mole of water heated from 353 K to 393 K at 101 kPa can be calculated using specific heat capacities and the enthalpy of vaporization. The process involves three stages: heating liquid water from 353 K to 373 K, vaporizing at 373 K, and heating the vapor from 373 K to 393 K. The equations used are ΔH(373K) = ΔH(353K) + Cp(H2O, l) * (373 - 353) and ΔH(393K) = ΔH(373K) + Cp(H2O, g) * (393 - 373), with Cp values of 75.0 J K-1 mol-1 for liquid and 35.4 J K-1 mol-1 for vapor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic concepts, specifically enthalpy
  • Familiarity with specific heat capacity calculations
  • Knowledge of phase changes and enthalpy of vaporization
  • Ability to interpret H (T) diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of enthalpy changes in phase transitions
  • Learn about the properties of water and its specific heat capacities at different phases
  • Explore the construction and interpretation of H (T) diagrams
  • Investigate the implications of pressure on enthalpy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, thermodynamics enthusiasts, and professionals involved in heat transfer and phase change processes will benefit from this discussion.

krootox217
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



What is the enthalpy ΔH, when 1 mole of water is heated at 101 kPa from 353 K to 393 K? Outline the process in an H (T) diagram.
The following values are available:
Cp (H2O, l) = 75.0 J K-1 mol-1; ΔHvap = 47.3 kJ mol-1 at 373 K; Cp (H2O, g) = 35.4 J K-1 mol-1

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to solve this:

hpBX1gV.png


Is this the right way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was unable to read what you wrote. The diagram looks OK qualitatively, but not quantitatively. The changes from 353 to 373 for the liquid and from 373 to 393 for the vapor are way too large. The first change is only 1500 J, and the second change is only 708 J. The enthalpy change for vaporization is shown correctly.

Chet
 
My writing is not the best, sorry

Ok, therefore I calculated it wrong.

For the first ΔH, do I have to calculate ΔH(373K)=ΔH(353K)+(Cp (H2O, l))*373K-(Cp (H2O, l))*353K?

And for the second ΔH, ΔH(393K)=ΔH(373K)+(Cp (H2O, g))*393K-(Cp (H2O, g))*373K?
 
krootox217 said:
My writing is not the best, sorry

Ok, therefore I calculated it wrong.

For the first ΔH, do I have to calculate ΔH(373K)=ΔH(353K)+(Cp (H2O, l))*373K-(Cp (H2O, l))*353K?

And for the second ΔH, ΔH(393K)=ΔH(373K)+(Cp (H2O, g))*393K-(Cp (H2O, g))*373K?
It goes like this:

H(373,l)=H(353,l)+Cp(H2O,l)*(373-353)

H(373,v)=H(373,l)+ΔHv(373)

H(393,v)=H(373,v)+Cp(H2O,v)*(393-373)Chet
 
Ok, now I'm a bit confused, because you don't use ΔH but H. And also which stage is which in the diagram?

So I start at 353K. Then the first ΔH is from the beginning to the point, where the temperature reaches 373K. This means until the point H(373,l)?

And then the water gets vaporized, which is ΔHv(373)?

And at the end, it goes from the end of ΔHv(373) to 393K, which means the ΔH goes from the end point of ΔHv(373) to H(393,v)?
 
krootox217 said:
Ok, now I'm a bit confused, because you don't use ΔH but H. And also which stage is which in the diagram?

So I start at 353K. Then the first ΔH is from the beginning to the point, where the temperature reaches 373K. This means until the point H(373,l)?

And then the water gets vaporized, which is ΔHv(373)?

And at the end, it goes from the end of ΔHv(373) to 393K, which means the ΔH goes from the end point of ΔHv(373) to H(393,v)?
Yes. This is all correct. So, the ΔH you are looking for is ΔH=H(393,v) - H(373,l). This is the change in enthalpy between the initial state and the final state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: krootox217
But in the diagram, I need to draw in the three ΔH's like i did in the first attempt?
 
krootox217 said:
But in the diagram, I need to draw in the three ΔH's like i did in the first attempt?
If that's what they're asking for. In your diagram, you took as a basis H(353,l) = 0 (which is perfectly acceptable).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: krootox217

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
27K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K