I Entropy and Heat Capacity Relation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct formulation of entropy and its relationship to heat capacities in thermodynamics. It clarifies that the equation involving the partial derivatives of entropy with respect to pressure, volume, and temperature is incorrect due to the dependence of these variables on each other, constrained by the equation of state. The concept of a third heat capacity, distinct from the standard definitions of Cv and Cp, is questioned as unnecessary since the existing definitions suffice. The conclusion reached is that S(P,V,T) is not a valid representation, as entropy is not a thermodynamic potential and the phase space is not three-dimensional. The participant resolves their confusion by recognizing the importance of independent variables in thermodynamic systems.
cwill53
Messages
220
Reaction score
40
I have a simple question sort of about exact differentials and deciding which variables matter and when.

I know we can write entropy ##S## as ##S(P,T)## and ##S(V,T)## to derive different relations between heat capacities ##C_V## and ##C_P##. I was wondering if it is technically correct to write

$$dS(P,V,T)=\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right )_{V,T}dP+\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right )_{P,T}dV+\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right )_{P,V}dT$$

$$\delta Q_{rev}=TdS(P,V,T)=T\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right )_{V,T}dP+T\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right )_{P,T}dV+T\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right )_{P,V}dT$$

Then how would we define heat capacities ##C,C_V,C_P## in terms of these partial derivatives?

I know we can define them as (at constant volume and constant pressure, respectively)

$$C_V=T\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right )_{V}; C_P=T\left ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right )_{P}$$

But I can't understand how to reconcile the gap between the second and third equations I typed.
 
Science news on Phys.org
There's a couple points of confusion here.

First, the first equation you wrote is not correct. Those partial derivatives are not independent. A given thermodynamic system has state variables P,V,T, and N. For a closed system, N is fixed. That means you're down to 3 remaining variables, as in your equation. However, there's always another constraint: the equation of state (e.g., ideal gas law or van der waals gas law), which reflects the unique physics of the system. This brings you down to two independent variables. In other words, any set of three state variables (P,V,T) or (P,S,T) or what have you, is over-defined.

Second, what is this third heat capacity C (as opposed to ##C_v## or ##C_p##) that you mention? The other two contain everything you need. Remember, any reversible process can be broken down into and isobaric or isochoric part plus an isothermal part. Irreversible processes that are internally reversible can be handled by the same approach if the rate of irreversibility is known.
 
Twigg said:
There's a couple points of confusion here.

First, the first equation you wrote is not correct. Those partial derivatives are not independent. A given thermodynamic system has state variables P,V,T, and N. For a closed system, N is fixed. That means you're down to 3 remaining variables, as in your equation. However, there's always another constraint: the equation of state (e.g., ideal gas law or van der waals gas law), which reflects the unique physics of the system. This brings you down to two independent variables. In other words, any set of three state variables (P,V,T) or (P,S,T) or what have you, is over-defined.

Second, what is this third heat capacity C (as opposed to ##C_v## or ##C_p##) that you mention? The other two contain everything you need. Remember, any reversible process can be broken down into and isobaric or isochoric part plus an isothermal part. Irreversible processes that are internally reversible can be handled by the same approach if the rate of irreversibility is known.
I ended up finding out that the phase space isn’t three dimensional; and also that ##S(P,V,T)## is illegal anyway as the third variable is already determined by the other two, and also S is not a thermodynamic potential. I can derive the heat capacities using ##S(P,T)## and ##S(V,T)## easily, I was just confused on how ##S(P,V,T)## was ill-defined. I understand now though.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top