Entropy and organized systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheusMX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Termodynamics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
TheusMX
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
If the entropy of the universe always increases, how is it possible for organized systems like life to exist? Shouldn't the natural tendency always be toward disorder and chaos? I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: binis
Physics news on Phys.org
Dissipation structure is an answer. In order the Earth including the lives evloves, the Sun provides energy. Entropy of the system decrease thanks to energy dissipation, which ends with entropy increase in the total system.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX, binis and russ_watters
TheusMX said:
I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
The same as for any other system.

How do you think ice crystals form?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
TheusMX said:
If the entropy of the universe always increases, how is it possible for organized systems like life to exist? Shouldn't the natural tendency always be toward disorder and chaos? I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
The answer is illustrated by the following pictures:
setting-time-aright-16-728.jpg
MinutePhysics_MTFY0H4EZx4_2m38s_920px.png
Organized systems correspond to states with high complexity, where entropy is neither too big nor too small. See also the Appendix in my https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08341
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
Demystifier said:
The answer is illustrated by the following pictures:
View attachment 357476
How are you measuring complexity?

The claim that a fully mixed container of milk and Coke has lower complexity than a partially mixed container? Presumably because you consider "fully mixed" to be a simple to describe macro-state despite requiring a vast quantity of information to completely describe a particular microstate. I am pretty sure that there is a broken definition lurking in there.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX, Dale and binis
jbriggs444 said:
How are you measuring complexity?

The claim that a fully mixed container of milk and Coke has lower complexity than a partially mixed container? Presumably because you consider "fully mixed" to be a simple to describe macro-state despite requiring a vast quantity of information to completely describe a particular microstate. I am pretty sure that there is a broken definition lurking in there.
Complexity is hard to define precisely. For some approaches see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Measures_of_complexity
 
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
Demystifier said:
Complexity is hard to define precisely. For some approaches see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Measures_of_complexity
And there it is. Indeed, one possible definition is broken.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_complexity said:
Effective complexity is a measure of complexity defined in a 1996 paper by Murray Gell-Mann and Seth Lloyd that attempts to measure the amount of non-random information in a system.[1][2] It has been criticised as being dependent on the subjective decisions made as to which parts of the information in the system are to be discounted as random.[3]
[emphasis mine]
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX