EP and active/passive mass

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the equivalence principle (EP) and the conservation of stress-energy in theories where geometry and matter are non-minimally coupled. It asserts that in General Relativity (GR), violating the EP through minimal coupling leads to non-conservation of stress-energy-momentum, establishing a link between the EP and the conservation laws that do not exist in Newtonian physics. The inquiry seeks clarification on the stress-energy tensor derived from such actions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with stress-energy tensor concepts
  • Knowledge of non-minimal coupling in field theories
  • Basic grasp of Newtonian physics and its limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the stress-energy tensor in non-minimally coupled theories
  • Explore the implications of the equivalence principle in General Relativity
  • Study the differences between active and passive mass in gravitational theories
  • Investigate conservation laws in various gravitational frameworks
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in gravitational theories, and students studying the foundations of General Relativity and its implications on mass and energy conservation.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
If we start from an action in which geometry and matter are non-minimally coupled, can the resulting theory have a covariantly conserved stress-energy tensor (if so, what is the stress-energy tensor in terms of the action?)

In Newtonian physics the EP (equivalence of inertial/passive mass) and the third law (equivalence of passive/active mass, momentum conservation) are not linked. I'd naively guess that violating the EP (minimal coupling) will cause non-conservation of stress-energy-momentum so that these are linked in GR, if not in Newtonian gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
13K