EP and active/passive mass

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Messages
15,171
Reaction score
3,378
If we start from an action in which geometry and matter are non-minimally coupled, can the resulting theory have a covariantly conserved stress-energy tensor (if so, what is the stress-energy tensor in terms of the action?)

In Newtonian physics the EP (equivalence of inertial/passive mass) and the third law (equivalence of passive/active mass, momentum conservation) are not linked. I'd naively guess that violating the EP (minimal coupling) will cause non-conservation of stress-energy-momentum so that these are linked in GR, if not in Newtonian gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org