Epotential of Point Charges - Really Hard Conceptual Problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
14 replies · 6K views
miguzi
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A thick spherical shell of charge Q and uniform volume charge density p is bounded by radii r1 and r2, where r2 > r1. With V = 0 at infinity, find the electric potential V as a function of the distance r from the center of the distribution, considering the regions (a) r > r2, (b) r2 > r > r1

a) I got V = (kQ)/r

b) I found that p = 3Q/(4Pi(r2^3-r1^3))
using that I found that qencl = Q*(r^3-r1^3)/(r2^3-r1^3)

Then using Gauss' Law I found that E = Q/(4*PI*r^2*Eo) * ((r^3-r1^3)/(r2^3-r1^3))

Change in E potential = -integral(E)*dr lower limit r^2, upper limit r

Vr - Vr2 = -kQ/(r2^3-r1^3) * (r^2/2 - r1^3/r + r2^2/2 + r1^3/r2)

I'm stuck at this part

The answer is:
3buhz.gif

I don't how they simplified the answer to that
 

Attachments

  • math020.gif
    math020.gif
    666 bytes · Views: 682
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should I move Vr2 to the other side?
 
yea that's right I think, Vr2 would equal to kQ/r but I'm also stumped on how it is simplied to the final answer.
 
First of all check the signs in the integral.
We have to find potential at distance r from the center not the potential difference between points at r and r2.
 
All looks well down to the integral. It seems to me the integral ought to go from infinity (where you know the potential) down to r. Of course you would have to do it in two parts, from infinity to r2 and then from r2 to r. Oh, I suppose you are already taking that first part into account as the Vr2.

In the last step, Vr - Vr2, I'm having trouble with the signs on the terms in the last brackets. Surely there should be two negative terms - including the r^2/2.
 
mukundpa said:
First of all check the signs in the integral.
We have to find potential at distance r from the center not the potential difference between points at r and r2.

Isn't that what I was doing? I subtract Epotential between r2 and r from the Vr2 to get Vr?

mukundpa said:
I think you got it.

I don't think so :(. I still don't know how to simplify it.

By the way reuped the pic of the answer

what I don't get is how they got (3r2^2)/2
 
Integrating field between limits r to r2 gives potential difference between the two distances. Potential at r is the potential difference between r and infinity.
 
My prof just posted solutions:

25gy069.jpg

I still don't get how he sub it in and simplified it
 

Attachments

  • solution.JPG
    solution.JPG
    28.1 KB · Views: 706
Last edited:
sorry i fixed the pics again.
 
what happened to the r1^3/r2 term?
 
Put V0 = KQ/r2 and then take KQ/(r2^3 - r1^3) common.

There are two terms r1^3/r2 with opposite sign and get canceled. The simplification is correct.
 
I don't understand what you mean by take KQ/(r2^3 - r1^3) common.

Do you mean:

kQ/(r2^3-r1^3) * ((r2^3-r1^3)/(kQr2) - r^2/2 + r2^2/2 +r1^3/r + r1^3/r2)


I get KQ on the bottom now.
 
V = [KQ/r2] - [KQ/(r2^3 - r1^3)] *[r^2/2 - r2^2/2 + r1^3/r - r1^3/r2]

= [KQ/(r2^3 - r1^3)]*{[(r2^3 - r1^3)/r2 - [r^2/2 - r2^2/2 + r1^3/r - r1^3/r2]}

= [KQ/(r2^3 - r1^3)]*{r2^3/r2 - r1^3/r2 - r^2/2 + r2^2/2 - r1^3/r + r1^3/r2}