Epsilon-Delta definition of a Limit: Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter GeoMike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Limit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 5K views
GeoMike
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
This may be a dumb question, but:

Using the epsilon-delta definition of a limit, when x is approaching the maximum of a parabola, like with: [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow0}-x^2[/tex], obviously any value of epsilon puts [tex]L+\epsilon[/tex] outside the range of f(x). So, I take it in this case only [tex]L-\epsilon[/tex] is considered (which made sense to me graphically since you now have two points where the function intersects this line)?

I just need verification (or correction) on this because every example and problem in the two textbooks I have has given/displayed an L and an epsilon such that [tex]L-\epsilon[/tex] and [tex]L+\epsilon[/tex] both lie within the range of f(x).

-GeoMike-
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
GeoMike said:
This may be a dumb question, but:

Using the epsilon-delta definition of a limit, when x is approaching the maximum of a parabola, like with: [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow0}-x^2[/tex], obviously any value of epsilon puts [tex]L+\epsilon[/tex] outside the range of f(x). So, I take it in this case only [tex]L-\epsilon[/tex] is considered?

no. you find the limit at a max/min just like you would at any other point. i think the only instance where the direction you approach a certain valuie matters is when you approcah from the right or left, not from above/below.
 
x always does take values between L + e and L - e for L = 0 and e an arbitrary positive number. The values all happen to be between L and L - e, with none greater than L, but this is extra information that you don't need to evaluate the limit.