I Equalizing airflow through multi-hole orifices

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anachronist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airflow
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the airflow dynamics through multi-hole orifices compared to a single hole of equivalent area, particularly in the context of a 3D-printed siren whistle inspired by a Francis turbine. While the Bernoulli equation suggests no distinction between the two configurations, the presence of friction and the perimeter-to-area ratio indicates that multiple smaller holes may behave differently due to increased friction. Observations show that the side with more holes (8) yields higher rotation speeds than the side with fewer holes (6), prompting speculation that the blade area may significantly influence airflow dynamics. The difference in performance could also be attributed to varying pressure drops when driving the turbine with constant flow. Ultimately, the interaction between hole configuration and blade design plays a critical role in the device's efficiency.
Anachronist
Gold Member
Messages
123
Reaction score
59
TL;DR Summary
One pressure vessel has 6 holes from which air escapes, another has 8 holes, total open area of the holes is same on each vessel. Should the volume flow be the same?
I know the Bernoulli equation for calculating the air velocity through a pressurized hole, but I am wondering if one hole of a given area behaves the same as multiple holes with the same total area. The Bernoulli equation doesn't make a distinction.

Background: As a personal 3D design and printing project I designed a siren whistle patterned after a Francis turbine, in which a dual runner (two runners back to back) chops the air coming out of exit holes on each side. The number of blades on each side of the runner is different (6 and 8) with a corresponding number of exit holes. As the runner rotates, the turbine produces two tones, with the airflow interrupted 6 times per rotation on one side, and 8 times per rotation on the other. The holes on each side have the same total open area.

The device works pretty well, but if I cover the holes on one side or the other, to allow only one side of the runner to drive its rotation, the rotation speed is clearly different for the same input pressure (by my best guess by breathing into it). It's slower when air exits only the 6-hole side.

That made me wonder if several small holes behave differently than fewer holes with the same open area.

Hmm, as I write this, I realize the difference could also be due to the different number of blades. The side with the higher number has a higher surface area on which the air can impart force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To your summary question:

No - the flow shouldn't be the same. One of the factors controlling the flow is friction. The implementation with more holes has a higher 'perimeter/area' ratio. More 'perimeter' results in more friction. How much actual difference that makes depends on how large a factor friction is in your specific case - higher velocities result in more significant friction terms.
 
That's what I thought. However, the effect I observe is the opposite of what would be expected (higher rotation when exhausting through the 8 hole side instead of the 6 hole side) so maybe the runner blade area is having a greater effect, which may be mitigated only slightly by the greater surface area of the holes.
 
If you drive the turbine with a constant flow, then it may have greater pressure drop with the 8 hole side, which may explain the higher velocity.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top