I Equalizing airflow through multi-hole orifices

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anachronist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airflow
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the airflow dynamics through multi-hole orifices compared to a single hole of equivalent area, particularly in the context of a 3D-printed siren whistle inspired by a Francis turbine. While the Bernoulli equation suggests no distinction between the two configurations, the presence of friction and the perimeter-to-area ratio indicates that multiple smaller holes may behave differently due to increased friction. Observations show that the side with more holes (8) yields higher rotation speeds than the side with fewer holes (6), prompting speculation that the blade area may significantly influence airflow dynamics. The difference in performance could also be attributed to varying pressure drops when driving the turbine with constant flow. Ultimately, the interaction between hole configuration and blade design plays a critical role in the device's efficiency.
Anachronist
Gold Member
Messages
123
Reaction score
59
TL;DR Summary
One pressure vessel has 6 holes from which air escapes, another has 8 holes, total open area of the holes is same on each vessel. Should the volume flow be the same?
I know the Bernoulli equation for calculating the air velocity through a pressurized hole, but I am wondering if one hole of a given area behaves the same as multiple holes with the same total area. The Bernoulli equation doesn't make a distinction.

Background: As a personal 3D design and printing project I designed a siren whistle patterned after a Francis turbine, in which a dual runner (two runners back to back) chops the air coming out of exit holes on each side. The number of blades on each side of the runner is different (6 and 8) with a corresponding number of exit holes. As the runner rotates, the turbine produces two tones, with the airflow interrupted 6 times per rotation on one side, and 8 times per rotation on the other. The holes on each side have the same total open area.

The device works pretty well, but if I cover the holes on one side or the other, to allow only one side of the runner to drive its rotation, the rotation speed is clearly different for the same input pressure (by my best guess by breathing into it). It's slower when air exits only the 6-hole side.

That made me wonder if several small holes behave differently than fewer holes with the same open area.

Hmm, as I write this, I realize the difference could also be due to the different number of blades. The side with the higher number has a higher surface area on which the air can impart force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To your summary question:

No - the flow shouldn't be the same. One of the factors controlling the flow is friction. The implementation with more holes has a higher 'perimeter/area' ratio. More 'perimeter' results in more friction. How much actual difference that makes depends on how large a factor friction is in your specific case - higher velocities result in more significant friction terms.
 
That's what I thought. However, the effect I observe is the opposite of what would be expected (higher rotation when exhausting through the 8 hole side instead of the 6 hole side) so maybe the runner blade area is having a greater effect, which may be mitigated only slightly by the greater surface area of the holes.
 
If you drive the turbine with a constant flow, then it may have greater pressure drop with the 8 hole side, which may explain the higher velocity.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top